Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum 100 Years of E=mc2

 Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.

# 100 Years of E=mc2

## 100 Years of E=mc2 - Physics Forum

### 100 Years of E=mc2 - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.

#1
09-02-2006, 04:44 PM
 physics.einstein@gmail.com Guest Posts: n/a
100 Years of E=mc2

100 Years of E=mc2 : 100 Years of E=mc2

[Only registered users see links. ]

1. What is E=mc2 ? What is its importance?

E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.

2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3. Is Einstein's derivation of L =mc2 correct?

The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein's 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation
only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.

7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

[Only registered users see links. ]

8. How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they don't exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

This book is being published soon.
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. Science today
is not the same in 16th or 17th century. We should aim at 22nd or 23rd
century scientific scenarios.

Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email [Only registered users see links. ]

[Only registered users see links. ]

#2
09-02-2006, 11:48 PM
 bonkers Guest Posts: n/a
100 Years of E=mc2

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which
cannot be
explained by E=mc2 .

Can your equation explain these anomalous results?

#3
09-03-2006, 01:28 PM
 physics.einstein@gmail.com Guest Posts: n/a
100 Years of E=mc2

bonkers wrote:
===============================================
AJAY SHARMA Responds
**** In addition to this equation dE = Ac2 dm. is also capable of
explaining the following existing observations.
(a) It is experimental observation [13-15] over three decades that
the total kinetic energy of fission fragments of U235 or Pu239 is found
experimentally 20-60 MeV less than Q-value (200MeV) predicted by E
= mc2. Let the value of energy observed is 175MeV, then it canbe
explained with value of A equal to 0.875 in dE = Ac2 dm.
(b) The mass of particle Ds (2317) discovered at SLAC [16] have mass
lower than current estimates based upon E = mc2. It can be
explained with value of A more than one in the generalized form of mass
energy equation i.e. dE = Ac2 dm.
References.
[13] E. G. Bakhoum, Physics Essays, Vol.15, No 1 (2002 ) 87
(Preprint archive : physics/0206061)
[14] F.J. Hambsch, et al. Nucl. Phys.A, 491, (1989) 56
[15] H. Thiereus, et al., Phys. Rev. C, 23 (1981) 2104
[16] A. Palano, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 (2003) 242001******
[Only registered users see links. ]

#4
09-03-2006, 01:30 PM
 physics.einstein@gmail.com Guest Posts: n/a
100 Years of E=mc2

bonkers wrote:

**** In addition to this equation dE = Ac2 dm. is also capable of
explaining the following existing observations.
(a) It is experimental observation [13-15] over three decades that
the total kinetic energy of fission fragments of U235 or Pu239 is found
experimentally 20-60 MeV less than Q-value (200MeV) predicted by E
= mc2. Let the value of energy observed is 175MeV, then it canbe
explained with value of A equal to 0.875 in dE = Ac2 dm.
(b) The mass of particle Ds (2317) discovered at SLAC [16] have mass
lower than current estimates based upon E = mc2. It can be
explained with value of A more than one in the generalized form of mass
energy equation i.e. dE = Ac2 dm.
References.
[13] E. G. Bakhoum, Physics Essays, Vol.15, No 1 (2002 ) 87
(Preprint archive : physics/0206061)
[14] F.J. Hambsch, et al. Nucl. Phys.A, 491, (1989) 56
[15] H. Thiereus, et al., Phys. Rev. C, 23 (1981) 2104
[16] A. Palano, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 90 (2003) 242001******
[Only registered users see links. ]

#5
09-04-2006, 03:08 AM
 Marco Licetti Guest Posts: n/a
100 Years of E=mc2

The importance of E=mc^2 is that Jews are smart. very smart.

#6
09-04-2006, 04:54 AM
 physics.einstein@gmail.com Guest Posts: n/a
100 Years of E=mc2

Marco Licetti wrote:

I simply view all souls are CREATED by THE SAME God.
It is true Einstein was a JEW and the greatest brain ever seen by
mankind.

AJAY SHARMA

 Tags 100 , emc2 , years

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home General Science Forums     Biology Forum     New Member Introductions Forum     Chemistry Forum         Organic Chemistry Forum     Physics Forum     General Science Questions and Layperson Board         Science and Religion Forum         Zoology Forum     Environmental Sciences and Issues General Forum     Chit Chat         Science and Lab Jokes     Article Discussion     Molecular Biology News and Announcements         Conferences , Symposiums and Meetings         Molecular Station Suggestion Forum         Instructions for Posting, Help, and Frequently Asked Questions     Science News and Views         Molecular Biology Lectures and Videos     Science Careers         Post-doctoral         Medical School         Ph.D Doctor of Philosophy         Science Jobs Forum Molecular Research Topics Forum     PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum         Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum     Bioinformatics         BioStatistics Forum     Molecular Biology Techniques         Molecular Cloning Forum         Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Forum         Agarose Gel Electrophoresis Forum         BioPhysics Forum         Gene Therapy     Cell Biology and Cell Culture         Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Necrosis Forum         Flow Cytometry Forum         Transfection Forum         Confocal - Microscopy Imaging Techniques         Immunology and Host-Pathogen Interactions         Signalling Biology         Stem Cell Forum     Basic Lab Protocols and Techniques         SDS-PAGE Gel Electrophoresis Forum     DNA Techniques         DNA Extraction Forum         cDNA Forum     Epigenetics Forum: DNA Methylation, Histone and Chromatin Study         ChIP Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Forum     Protein Science         Antibody Forum             Immunoprecipitation Forum         Western Blot Forum         Protein Crystallography Forum         Recombinant Protein Forum         ELISA Assay Forum         Protein Forum     Proteomics Forum         Peptide Forum         Mass Spectrometry Forum         2-D Gel Electrophoresis Forum     Omics and Genomics Forum         Microarrays Forum         Genomics Forum     RNA Techniques Forum         RNAi and SiRNA Forum     Histology Forum         Immunohistochemistry Forum         Immunocytochemistry Forum         Electron Microscopy Forum         Immunofluorescence Forum     Protocols and Methods Forum     Molecular Biology Articles and Protocols     Animal and Molecular Model Systems         Drosophila Forum         Yeast Forum         Zebrafish Forum         Botany Forum         C Elegans Forum         Arabidopsis and Plant Biology         Microbiology Forum         Knockout Mouse Forum     Chromatography Forum Products and Vendor Discussion     Molecular Biology Products and Vendors         Bad Product/Service? Post Here         Lab Equipment Discussion and Reviews Regional Molecular Biology Discussion     Forum Chemie     Forum Biologie     Forum Biologia     Forum Chimica     Forum Physik     Forum De Chimie     Forum De Physique     Forum Chemia     中国人分子的生物学论坛 Chinese     Greek Molecular Biology Forums     分子生物学のフォーラム Japanese     ميدان فارسى. Persian Molecular Biology     [أربيك] علم ساحة- Arabic     Forum de Biologie Moleculaire     Forum Biologia Molecolare     Forum die Molekularbiologie     Foro Biologia Molecular

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 1 08-01-2010 02:18 PM AJAY SHARMA Physics Forum 0 09-26-2006 12:51 PM physics.einstein@gmail.com Physics Forum 0 09-26-2006 06:02 AM caltechdude Physics Forum 428 01-21-2005 09:39 PM Peter Van Osta Cell Biology and Cell Culture 0 01-06-2005 10:18 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:45 PM.

 Contact Us - Molecular Biology - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top