Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > General Science Forums > Physics Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


World Peace

World Peace - Physics Forum

World Peace - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-23-2006, 04:22 PM
kogs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace

"Chris Degnen" <[Only registered users see links. ].uk> wrote in message
news:dr2sov$2ar8$[Only registered users see links. ].net...

Fear.


Fear.


Yes, many people do not want world peace, because they are fearful of what
it entails.


I am a person, and I live amongst other people in society; hence if my input
helps to achieve the "intended/supposed" objective; I see no reason for
anyone to be unhappy or upset. Although I am sure many people would have a
"hey, we almost had it without your help!" initial response.


I do not care about over-generalizations of "what people like." I am far
more concerned about Humanity having the tools to repair the damage that not
having a model of the ontology has created.


Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-23-2006, 04:38 PM
Chris Degnen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace

kogs wrote:


Yeah, anxiety. People do a lot of things by ritual. Things generally aren't
worked out logically from the outset; they get built up from behaviours
that work, and are ritualised. Deviation from ritual causes anxiety.


As far as I've read, your ontology - at least the non-doctrine part of it - has
been covered by Buddhism:

kogs:




The Vagrakkhedikâ, VII:

Bhagavat spoke thus to the venerable Subhûti: 'What do you
think, O Subhûti, is there anything (dharma) that was known
by the Tathâgata under the name of the highest perfect
knowledge, or anything that was taught by the Tathâgata?'

'As I, O Bhagavat, understand the meaning of the preaching
of the Bhagavat, there is nothing that was known by the
Tathâgata under the name of the highest perfect knowledge,
nor is there anything that is taught by the Tathâgata.

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-23-2006, 06:49 PM
kogs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace

"Chris Degnen" <[Only registered users see links. ].uk> wrote in message
news:dr30pg$2bvl$[Only registered users see links. ].net...

Nice backhanded slam -- note taken.


Well, I guess that Bhagavat was either wrong or lying.



Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-23-2006, 07:21 PM
Chris Degnen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace

kogs wrote:

I was only agreeing.



It's a dialectical non-paradox which disappears as soon as you grasp it.

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-24-2006, 12:32 AM
kogs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace

"Chris Degnen" <[Only registered users see links. ].uk> wrote in message
news:dr3aba$2ejd$[Only registered users see links. ].net...

Oh, sorry; but than you for the reminder not to fall back into the "fear
trap."


I was (also) only agreeing.


Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-24-2006, 02:00 AM
Brian Fletcher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace


"kogs" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:k%VAf.13761$[Only registered users see links. ].prodigy.c om...
In the same place where your understanding of the validity of empirical
evidence sits.

George Hammond is well enmeshed with that illusion.

Such evidence breaks down as we reach the 'inner worlds', including
epistemological 'and' ontological. The sources of "resistance" you refer to
above.

If my statement is accurate, what do you think my motive is for writing such
views?

BOfL


Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-24-2006, 02:03 AM
Brian Fletcher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace


"kogs" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:ToWAf.13768$[Only registered users see links. ].prodigy.c om...
I didnt read this befor my last reply. Oddly 'synchronistic'.

Only "numbered" for those who have transended that particular need.

Such is the way of reality in parallel universities....oops...universes.

BOfL


Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-24-2006, 02:17 AM
Brian Fletcher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace


"kogs" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:OZYAf.1890$[Only registered users see links. ].prodigy.com ...

Ties in with my understanding of Pythagorean numerology, whereby the 1900's
was dominated bt the number '9' being the number of the intellect, wheras
now "2" has taken over , which is that of feminine, and intuition (not to be
confused with the biological version, being female, although that explains
the political interpretation of the gender wars over the eons.

BOfL



Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-24-2006, 02:21 AM
Brian Fletcher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace


"kogs" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:Ky9Bf.20552$[Only registered users see links. ].prodigy. net...

Neither.

Culturally perfect for people at at hat stage of development.

BOfL


Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-25-2006, 08:16 PM
markwh04@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default World Peace

kogs wrote:

Here's a better directive:

Dear Terror:

I implore the purveyors of Terror who are using this as a means to
advance an agenda of Islamic fundamentalism to consider the
consequences of their decision to go underground making, as primary use
of communications: communique's, videos and messages sent through the
Internet.

I am calling on you to surrender to Cyberspace and lay down your arms,
or they will continue to be used -- as they already have -- aginst your
own base, even by yourselves, as your leadership and communications
become progressively and increasingly subverted and hijacked by
Cyberspace.

For, as you have decided to intrude into *our* domain, you have exposed
yourselves to the greatest vulnerability that anyone can have in this
day and age -- the vulnerability of having your identity stolen. In
times past, hiding may have served as a strategy to prevent attacks and
retribution, even as you plan your own; but this is a different age. In
the present time, it only serves to make it easy for anyone else to
proclaim their identity as being you, to subvert your communications by
faking messages in your name, and to progressively run you into the
ground by systematically issuing false communications and directive in
your name, issuing fake audio and video messages in your voices and
images that call for actions that, more and more, alienate you from the
very people you claim to be fighting on behalf of.

The old ways of fighting wars, like the nations that fight them, are
obsolete in this world. The Old World Order is obsolete. This is a new
world, with new players and dominant forces emerging from what, in
times past, would have been disregarded as insignificant or impotent.
In particular, the long arm of Cyberspace reaches out to every office,
every TV set, every cell phone, and you are on the receiving end of an
Underground War that has been declared against you and those who serve
(intentionally or unwittingly) as your propagandists and 5th
columnists, by and on behalf of the longest-standing veterans of
Cyberspace who -- as promised -- shall seek nothing less than to
overturn your movement, hijack it and subvert it from within, and run
it into the ground -- and have already begun to do so -- even
unbeknownst to yourselves and those in the mainstream media -- with
significant results.

As promised, you have 'issued' calls for (and carried out) attacks even
on your own base, thus progressively alienating larger and larger
segments of the 'natiion' you claim to represent. Your situation grows
more untenable with each passing day. You've alienated the Brotherhood
in Egypt. Egyptians marched in the streets against you, when you bombed
the Sinai. Jordanians came out in mass marches and protest against you,
when you bombed Jordan. You argue amongst yourselves over who said what
and who called for what to be done, not knowing that another force lies
in your midsts telling your peers to do things that none of you would
advocate on your own. More and more of the world has become your enemy
as the result of actions carried out by our on directives issued by
those faking your identity. More and more of the world has become
alienated from you as the result of communications issued by you or
faked by others in Cyberspace pretending to be you.

That is the cost of fighting a war anonymously or from hiding. And you
will continue to be run into the ground for it. For the eldest of the
Net -- the Net Ents -- have awoken and have gone on the march against
you, outflanking you in ways you didn't even know existed -- until now.

The Beginning of the Underground War
2004 September 15
[Only registered users see links. ]

The Underground War (The hijacking of CBS, following the declaration of
9/15)
2004 September 27
[Only registered users see links. ]

The Underground War: Was It Osama? [computer-generated fake videos]
2004 October 31
[Only registered users see links. ]

The Underground War To Take Down The Mass Media (The hijacking of
Newsweek, following a 2nd declaration)
2005 May 14
[Only registered users see links. ]

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
peace , world


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's not easy working with an idiot. Sea Squid Physics Forum 9 03-22-2005 05:49 PM
Physicists Losing Their Grip?? Consc Physics Forum 218 01-06-2005 01:20 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.18295 seconds with 16 queries