Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > General Science Forums > Physics Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


CHILD GROWTH CURVE = HUBBLE EXPANSION

CHILD GROWTH CURVE = HUBBLE EXPANSION - Physics Forum

CHILD GROWTH CURVE = HUBBLE EXPANSION - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2006, 12:47 AM
George Hammond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH CURVE = HUBBLE EXPANSION



Hammond claims a child sees a "magnified" world compared
to an adult. Someone recently protested if a child and adult
point the same object their arms point to the same point in space
..... so how can the child be seeing a vastly larger object?

The answer to this is that the child's world is a "curved" version of
the adult's world.
It is here demonstrated that this curvature is caused by a
"Hubble Expansion" of the child's world relative to the adult's.

The conventional Hubble expansion is a well known solution to
Einstein's equation G_uv = rho (rho = mass density). The Hubble
expansion is derived by plugging in a metric of the type:

ds^2 = -dt^2 + a(t)^2 dR^2 (Friedman metric)

where a(t) is the radius of the universe. Putting this metric in Einstein's
equation results in the well known Friedman equation which when
solved yields the radius of the universe, a(t), which shows that the
universe is expanding with time.

Now, Hammond has discovered that "subjective spacetime" is
ALSO curved, and the curvatrure is given by:

G_uv = - ln (brain growth)

this is the "subjective space" version of Einstein's equation. And
note that braingrowth now takes the place of mass density..

Now, I say, a similar solution for the "expansion of the subjective
universe" can be found by inserting the following metric:

ds^2 = a(t')^2 ( -dt^2 + dR^2) (Hammond metric)

Notice the slight difference between this metric and the Friedman metric.
In the Hammond metric the radius of the universe (the expansion factor
a(t') ) dilates the Time dimension as well as the Space dimension.
In fact the Hammond metric is already well known to relativity where
it is called the "conformal metric" and t' is called the "conformal time".
Of course in relativity, the transformation dt = a(t)dt' is only a
convenient "coordinate transformation" and t' is not the real physically
observable (clock) time. However, Hammond points out that in
subjective space it is known that growth (e.g. brain growth) not only
causes a spatial magnification, it also causes an increase in clock rate
(i.e. mental speed), so therefore conformal time ACTUALLY IS
"physical clock time" in subjective space.
At any rate, solving the Friedman equation in conformal time one
gets the well known result:

a(t') = const.[1 - cos(t')]

This is the famous curve first derived by Friedman in 1922 and shows
that a curved universe will expand to a maximum radius and then collapse
back to zero. The first half of this curve is known as the famous "Hubble
expansion" of the universe.
Now, I'm pointing out that this equation, when solved in "subjective
space" would have to describe the "human growth curve" of a human
being from birth to adulthood, and we see that the curve is of entirely
the correct shape... and that there are at least 4 adjustable parameters
in the solution which means it doubtlessly can made to conform
precisely to the human growth curve to within experimental accuracy.
This can hardly be a coincidence given the theoretical origin of the curve.
At any rate.... we now see HOW it is that a child can see a highly
magnified world, compared to an adult... and yet be seen to be
pointing in the same direction as an adult. An "expansion of the
universe" is similar to being inside a large balloon while it is being
inflated. If say a horse is painted on the inside of the balloon, the
horse will get bigger and bigger, but farther and farther away.
This means that if the child points to the horses head, his arm will
remain in a fixed direction no matter how large the balloon gets.
And this is why a child is seen to be pointing in exactly the same
direction as an adult, even though the child may be seeing a
horse that is TWICE the size of the one the adult is seeing.
Hope this clarifies the situation... and I would point out that
the identification of the Hubble Curve as the Human Growth Curve
is just one more piece of evidence that human perception is
described by a relativistic Curvature, and that therefore,
God=G_uv.
--
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
[Only registered users see links. ]
mirror site:
[Only registered users see links. ]
========================================


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-08-2006, 03:37 PM
George Hammond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION


"Steve Ralph" <[Only registered users see links. ].uk> wrote in message
news:43c11fec$0$2713$[Only registered users see links. ].net...
[Hammond]
Like Pancho Villa said, "we don't need no movies".

Fact is we have a vast highly educated well paid and laid
back scientific community. The theory has been published
in the official peer reviewed scientific literature and online
copies of the paper can be found posted at:
[Only registered users see links. ]
for your reading convenience.
All we need is a couple of physics bigshots to get off the
symposium and book signing circuit long enough to read the
theory and give the longsuffering public the competent and
official scientific opinion they're entitled to. We figure that's
what the taxpayers are paying bigshots for.....and until they
do it, Hammond is going to continue to scream his head off
about persecution, jealousy and deliberate suppression of the
public interest on every relevant Newsgroup on Usenet.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
[Only registered users see links. ]
mirror site:
[Only registered users see links. ]
========================================


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2006, 04:14 PM
T Wake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION


"George Hammond" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:4lawf.4593$%[Only registered users see links. ].atl.earthl ink.net...

And, sadly, on several newsgroups that aren't relevant. Remember your
attempts to cross post to alt.usenet.kooks?


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2006, 04:34 PM
sam ende
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION

George Hammond wrote:


i think it's a great satire.

sammi
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2006, 05:35 PM
TMG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH CURVE = HUBBLE EXPANSION

George Hammond wrote:

and faster - see below.
<snip>


I thought you had previously concluded that there is "no grav. time
dilation in R-W space." and "One can see immediately that the "universe
expansion factor", a(t), only dilates the space part of the metric and
not the time part."

You seem to have plugged unrelated metrics together, at least one of
which includes "God".

But, why don't you see if s.p.research will pick up this "Child Growth
Curve = Hubble Expansion" idea and critique.

You might be on to something - at least as a first order approximation
of God (since Friedman is a 1st order approximation cosmology).

Good luck George.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2006, 12:59 AM
George Hammond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION


"TMG" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered users see links. ]...
[Hammond]
There is no time dilation in R-W space. However subjective human
space is not described by the R-W metric.... it is described by the
"Conformal metric" which DOES dilate both time and space.
This is an experimentally verified fact... since it is a fact of
common experience that human intelligence (mental speed in
bits/second) increases linearly for the first 18 years of life.
Both the RW metric and the Conformal metric are known
to be valid solutions to the Einstein Field Equations, and it is
simply a matter of observation as to which is observed..... fact is,
the RW metric is observed in Objective spacetime, and the
Conformal metric is observed in Subjective space; I'm here
to tell you.
Fact is, the RW metric explains Hubble, and the Conformal
metric explains the Human Growth Curve and the human
phenomena we call "GOD".
[Hammond]
The relation of the R-W to the Conformal metric is
well known. God *IS* described by the conformal
metric.
[Hammond]
Already sent it to sci.physics.research and sci.astro.research.
the moderators of those groups, such as Ted Bun are yuppie
prigs who are so jealous of me they could scream. They deliberately
and eagerly suppress anything I post to their little "private moron's
atheist club" and usually with such furtive remarks as "rejected for obvious
reasons" (one of Ted Bun's comments to me).
[Hammond]
First order my butt.... Friedman's solution is exactly correct and
has been known to be ever since Einstein himself printed a
personal retraction of his initial disbelief in 1922. Friedman was
a hero who bailed out Einstein's butt for him when he couldn't
figure out how to prevent the collapse of the universe and was
beleagured by the eintire physics community. The Friedman
solution was the historic Waterloo of the last Einstein critics.
You said it...

========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
[Only registered users see links. ]
mirror site:
[Only registered users see links. ]
========================================


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-09-2006, 01:39 AM
TMG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION

George Hammond wrote:
<snip>

Uh, no. Friedman assumes a homogeneous model of matter distribution.
Observation tells us that isn't the case (it's closer to fractal).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2006, 06:34 AM
George Hammond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION


"TMG" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered users see links. ]...
[Hammond]
Uh, no..... Friedman assumes a perfectly homogenous matter
distribution (so does Einstein).... of course that doesn't allow for
the existence of stars, planets and humans..... which can be called
"perturbations" to the mass distribution. However such
perturbations are IRRELEVANT to this discussion... as usual.
BTW, Friedman's solution contains the cosmological constant
/\ as one of the mass-energy terms. /\ appears to be of dubious
impact on real-spacetime cosmology.... but it might be very
significant in the Friedman model of the brain, where /\ may
be the theoretical representation of "biological brain growth".
In fact, /\ may have something to do with why the conformal
metric describes subjective space, while the RW metric describes
conventional space. It sure would be ironic is "Einstein's biggest
blunder", (/\), turns out to be the explanation of "God".
I'm looking into all this now.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
[Only registered users see links. ]
mirror site:
[Only registered users see links. ]
========================================


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-09-2006, 05:02 PM
Steve Ralph
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION


"George Hammond" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:4lawf.4593$%[Only registered users see links. ].atl.earthl ink.net...

No, all we need is bigmouth egomaniac George Hammond to get off his
self-pitying
ass and do a simple experiment - something that he appears to be congenitaly
incapable of.

BTW - thaught I was killfiled.

sr


We figure that's



Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2006, 12:37 AM
TMG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CHILD GROWTH = HUBBLE EXPANSION

George Hammond wrote:

Which is why it's a 1st order approximation (as I said).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
child , curve , expansion , growth , hubble


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena (gravity) NovaJoe Physics Forum 2 10-20-2007 04:04 PM
RHU Theory: The relativity of the inertial phenomena... NovaJoe Physics Forum 0 10-20-2007 11:23 AM
Growth Curve Question Sandra Vergara Yeast Forum 0 02-22-2007 02:51 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.18967 seconds with 16 queries