"Josef Matz" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:4302fdb8$0$6978$[Only registered users see links. ]...
Graviton. Gravitons have been implicated in the "dual to a black
hole"s that were recently produced.
I refuse to fight with an unarmed man. GR has made predictions
and these predictions have been experimentally verified. It has
a domain of applicability, the "upper end" of which is still
As to string theory, it is also entering the realm of the
testable... with the aforementioned "dual to a black hole".
So, all-pervasive physical phenomena are simply defined by their
geometry. Works for Newton, but not all movement in space
follows those law. And Gravitons are only a hypotheses yet unfound,
(but they are effective in filling in statistically for unknowns), are they
Thank you Dr. Smith for the clarification ;>)
R. Henry Nigl
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in
"RHNL" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered users see links. ]...
So far, efforts to verify this supposition have not been successful.
Time is not dependent on the definition of gravity. It is essential to
Special Relativity, wherein it appears as a geometric dimension orthogonal
to the three spatial dimensions, and interconvertible with them through a
simple rotation of the coordinate system corresponding to the introduction
of a relative evlocity between the observer and the phenomenon being
There is no gravity in Special Relativity Theory.
Since your premises are not valid, the question you have raised based upon
those premises are moot.