Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > General Science Forums > Physics Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0

Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0 - Physics Forum

Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0 - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2005, 06:03 AM
ring_theory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0



We assume that 0 allways indicates nil would that be a correct assesment?

What if were wrong and 0 indicates true unity instead of 0 nil, it is
0.99999999? would it still be an additive?
If 0 is a indicator of unity would it change the way we look at the results
of many componants of physics?
Could you furthur your calculations replacing the 0 nil with 0.999999999
unity?

If = 0 is true unity wouldn't it unify all the forms of physics?


It isn't at all possible that the mathematics could be wrong?

Isn't it possible that the result "= 0" in complicated mathematics isn't
really nil? Which is common opinion in basic mathematics and I support basic
mathematics as 0 bieng nil. But in complicated mathematics because it is
concidered as an additive it must be nil. That's wrong it isn't a additive
it is true unity = 0.99999999. rounded off to 1 because the sum nil isn't
useable in calculations. However 1 is also regarded as unity and works in
the mathematics however it isn't true unity as popular opinion indicates.

Define unity it's the radius of a curve. the result = 0 has a physical
representation as with most results in mathematics. 0's physical form is a
closed radius "RING". The mathematics is drawing a picture of a ring however
one critical element can't be viewed in a picture of a ring, that is
eccentric movement. I would think that the fact that a infinite number such
as unity ( 0.9999999-infinite) would make mankind question our symbol for
infinity. However I must point out that the symbol for infinity is a twisted
ring. twisted to represent movement on a constant reoccuring cyclic path.

In short unity is a ring rotating cyclic for infinity.
So with that said the *error* in mathematics is the misunderstanding that 0
is nil and not true unity. this error is furthur compounded by
misunderstanding that
in the laws of physics = 0 nil, no result. "end game" however you want to
refer to it is really the result = 0, unity, ring, eccentric, cyclic,
infinite conservation.

What if there is a unifying force to physics? Would it be perpetual?

I admit I'm not a math guy but I feel this needs atleast some serious
concideration. I see a pattern in physics with one common result = 0.

That's discovery by invention at work.

ring



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-14-2005, 06:30 AM
Morituri-|-Max
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


"ring_theory" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:dP9Zd.126887$tl3.51495@attbi_s02...


Calm down. Easy boy. Whoa! Sit down and count to ten.

Why don't you figure out whether your super motor works with the TRUE
(angels sing) laws of physics before you go off and also try and redefine
mathematics?


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2005, 07:40 AM
Double-A
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


ring_theory wrote:
assesment?
results
0.999999999


Only if truncation is the standard instead of rounding.

Double-A

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2005, 08:08 AM
ring_theory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


"Morituri-|-Max" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:wcaZd.10296$[Only registered users see links. ].com...

I'll do whatever I damned well please. You won't tell me what to do. My
parents tried that it didn't work for them. What the **** makes you think
it'll work for you. BAH!

You don't worry about my device I can handle that. you can be blind to the
error it wouldn't hurt me a bit. you can stay on the mainstream of
stupidity.
It's obvious that drawing pictures for you won't help.

Idiot!!






Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-14-2005, 09:45 AM
Steve Ralph
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


"ring_theory" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:fEbZd.126999$tl3.52016@attbi_s02...

Like build a perpetual motion machine. Go on then, why not just do it
and astound us all?


Another girly hissy fit from another looser who can't stand being told he is
wrong


But you can't build it.


With which you are obviously intimately familiar.


It is obvious that you cannot draw, for which I am most thankful.

Sr




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-14-2005, 10:15 AM
ring_theory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


Ohh and this coming from a nation that has countless rings that are presumed
mysterious but they refer to a ring as a asshole.
Your ancestors played a dirty trick on you, the very function is annular.
anus annular ring. the answer is in your language but you'll never see it
it's a asshole. LOL!!! That's funny.

However i can accept bieng wrong providing I'm given the oppertunity to be
proven right or wrong. Not just some small talk in a newsgroup. I don't
even care now i'm doing my own thing **** the silly monkeys.

Ring (asshole, anus, annular) ROTFLMFAO!


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-14-2005, 11:09 AM
Morituri-|-Max
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


"ring_theory" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:fEbZd.126999$tl3.52016@attbi_s02...

ROFL, obviously they have neglected to renew your meds.


You can handle not being able to figure out how to measure the outputs of
the motor?

Have you ever actually USED a multimeter?


Choice considering the source...


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-14-2005, 11:13 AM
Morituri-|-Max
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


"ring_theory" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:bvdZd.127120$tl3.100376@attbi_s02...

Rings?


This sentence means nothing.. try again with a reference the people on this
planet can understand?


Notice how the spelling goes to hell when ring doesn't have his way..


I'm glad you think you're funny.. everybody else here thinks you are pretty
pathetic.

Come back when you learn to use a multimeter.. or when momma lets you back
on the internet.


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-14-2005, 11:14 AM
ring_theory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


"Morituri-|-Max" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:%heZd.14259$[Only registered users see links. ].com...
redefine
think
the

Yea a fluke, I can handle it don't frett



Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-14-2005, 11:36 AM
Morituri-|-Max
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0


"ring_theory" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:EmeZd.127489$4q6.26982@attbi_s01...


Why would I fret? I asked a question.. you really really need to sit down,
take a breath and start working on that attitude.. here say this 10 times
in a row with your eyes closed, "The investor is always right."

If you can do that and drop your atrocious attitude, you might eventually
patent a pinger detector.


Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
incorrect , mathematics


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTC Towers: The case for controlled demolition schoenfeld.one@gmail.com Physics Forum 240 08-10-2007 06:25 AM
johnreed take 1A - modified june 6, 2006 johnlawrencereedjr Physics Forum 0 07-24-2006 09:45 PM
johnreed take 1A - Modified June 6,2006 johnlawrencereedjr Physics Forum 2 07-18-2006 09:20 PM
johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006 johnlawrencereedjr Physics Forum 14 07-13-2006 10:11 PM
Mixed or applied mathematics Clifford J. Nelson Chemistry Forum 0 12-21-2003 05:09 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.18055 seconds with 16 queries