We assume that 0 allways indicates nil would that be a correct assesment?
What if were wrong and 0 indicates true unity instead of 0 nil, it is
0.99999999? would it still be an additive?
If 0 is a indicator of unity would it change the way we look at the results
of many componants of physics?
Could you furthur your calculations replacing the 0 nil with 0.999999999
If = 0 is true unity wouldn't it unify all the forms of physics?
It isn't at all possible that the mathematics could be wrong?
Isn't it possible that the result "= 0" in complicated mathematics isn't
really nil? Which is common opinion in basic mathematics and I support basic
mathematics as 0 bieng nil. But in complicated mathematics because it is
concidered as an additive it must be nil. That's wrong it isn't a additive
it is true unity = 0.99999999. rounded off to 1 because the sum nil isn't
useable in calculations. However 1 is also regarded as unity and works in
the mathematics however it isn't true unity as popular opinion indicates.
Define unity it's the radius of a curve. the result = 0 has a physical
representation as with most results in mathematics. 0's physical form is a
closed radius "RING". The mathematics is drawing a picture of a ring however
one critical element can't be viewed in a picture of a ring, that is
eccentric movement. I would think that the fact that a infinite number such
as unity ( 0.9999999-infinite) would make mankind question our symbol for
infinity. However I must point out that the symbol for infinity is a twisted
ring. twisted to represent movement on a constant reoccuring cyclic path.
In short unity is a ring rotating cyclic for infinity.
So with that said the *error* in mathematics is the misunderstanding that 0
is nil and not true unity. this error is furthur compounded by
in the laws of physics = 0 nil, no result. "end game" however you want to
refer to it is really the result = 0, unity, ring, eccentric, cyclic,
What if there is a unifying force to physics? Would it be perpetual?
I admit I'm not a math guy but I feel this needs atleast some serious
concideration. I see a pattern in physics with one common result = 0.
That's discovery by invention at work.