| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| In 2D, a spinning (in the manner of an bicycle tire) disk is dropped from a height onto a completely non-slip surface. Is 100% of the rotational momentum converted to linear momentum? If the surface was slightly elastic and caused the disk to bounce, would the disk stop spinning after it hit (and was in the air after the bounce). My confusion is, assuming non-slip, non-elastic surface, the disk should move in a linear fashion after contact with the surface, *and* also roll along the surface. So is some of the rotational momentum is not transfered? Or is the linear momentum transfered back to rotational as it is in contact with the surface instantly after it hits. Hope this is clear enough, TIA. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Dear Starton X. Mangrove: "Starton X. Mangrove" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:Rskyd.22827$[Only registered users see links. ].rr.com... Momentum is conserved. Energy is not. Try it with a superball. The rotation reverses, because the ball (or tire) is a deformable solid... It has been a long time since I tried formulating such a problem. I would think the radius of gyration would need to be doped out for the wheel *at the point of rolling contact*. The angular momentum about the point of contact should equal the angular momentum before contact. I THINK. David A. Smith |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Starton X. Mangrove" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:Rskyd.22827$[Only registered users see links. ].rr.com... a No. For that to happen, the disk would have to stop spinning *entirely* and _slide_ along the surface. The actual limiting condition (determined by fact that the friction between the disk and the surface is non-zero) is that the linear velocity v of the disk as it rolls equals the velocity of the rim relative to the center of the disk as it spins. the Interestingly, a sufficiently elastic _tire_ would engage the non-skid surface, absorb the rotational kinetic energy in a wind-up spring manner, and then re-release the energy as the disk rebounds in the opposite direction, so the rebounding disk could actually *reverse* the direction of its spin. This is easily seen by imparting a spin with a horizontal axis to an elastic "superball" and then dropping it - the alternating directions of successive bounces demonstrate that the spin reverses on each bounce. ....eventually. The situation can become complicated as the superball example demonstrates, but for the disk to move horizontally along the surface without skidding, it MUST roll. HTH Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I dont see how this is possible, you say the angular momentum at the point of contact will be equal to the angular momentum before contact? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| demonstrates, it I wanted to avoid the superball example -- I should have been clearer. I only meant to introduce elasticity in order to have the disk in the air after contact to examine what it's behavior would be without the subsequent contact with the surface. Assuming the disk simply "bounces" with no elastic deformation (think reversal of its normal force * coefficient of restitution) When in the 'air', my belief is the disk would not spin after contact, having transfered all its rotation momentum to linear momentum. Anyway, Im still confused. Having a disk w/o any elasticity and 100% friction -- how do I calculate the resulting linear and angular values, assuming the disk rolls after contact. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Dear Starton X. Mangrove: "Starton X. Mangrove" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:KZpyd.29199$[Only registered users see links. ].rr.com.. . Yes. "Radius of Gyration" I believe is what needs to be determined for the wheel, about the point of contact with the ground. Angular momentum *must* be conserved. You have no external applied torques... tadchem is always more correct and complete than I, so if he posted something different (and understandable) then trust him. David A. Smith |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Starton X. Mangrove" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:f7qyd.29200$[Only registered users see links. ].rr.com.. . <snip> after The amount of spin remaining after the bounce is variable, from 100% of the original spin (no loss of angular momentum) to -100% of the original spin (complete reversal of the angular momentum). You can easily model a disk w/o any elasticity and 100% friction using modeling clay, uncooked pizza dough, raw liver, or any of a number of other substances. No elasticity means it doesn't bounce, and 100% friction means it loses *all* its energy to deformation due to the impact, and the shape is not elastically restored. [One of the hardest things to do in the empirical sciences is to learn how to ask the right questions.] Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
| Tags |
| dynamics , question , rotational |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Human Cytome Project - Update 24 Jan. 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 1 | 08-01-2010 02:18 PM |
| Human Cytome Project - an idea - Update 19 April 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 1 | 06-01-2009 02:17 PM |
| Fluid dynamics question | metro414@gmail.com | Physics Forum | 2 | 11-25-2005 07:58 AM |
| A Human Cytome Project - an idea - Update 14 March 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 0 | 03-14-2005 01:27 PM |
| Human Cytome Project - Update 6 Jan. 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 0 | 01-06-2005 10:18 AM |