| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| If I remember right from college, there's a particular, formal way of expressing certain statistics, and I'd like to learn more about that way. As an example (and I know I'll mangle this), one might aver, "According to our survey, X% of Americans believe the moon is made of green cheese, plus or minus Y somethings, with a confidence level of Z%." Does any of this ring a bell? If so, can you teach me more, either by explaining it or by citing some authoritative URLs, or both. Thanks. --Johnny johnnyg aattssiiggnn kc.rr.com [Only registered users see links. ] |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Johnny" <[Only registered users see links. ].com> wrote in message news:dji3d.25857$[Only registered users see links. ]-kc.rr.com... You are close. The quantity being statistically estimated (in your example, the X% of ...) is usually expressed first. The error bounds (aka margin of error, uncertainty, and similar names) are usually expressed as a "plus or minus," in absolute terms, using the same units as the quantity estimated. Then the quantity being estimated is a percentage itself, the error bounds are (by most reputable statisticians) taken as absolute percentages, as the "plus or minus Y somethings" in your example. Relative percentages are also sometimes used, but only when the quantity being estimated is *not* a percentage. The confidence level is usually taken at certain convenient value, usually 90%, 95%, or 99% because this allows use of existing statistical tables for more sophisticated analyses. For example, a colleague of mine once determined the helium-4 content of the air is 5.2204 +/- 0.0010 parts-per-million (ppm) at the 95% level. Remembering that statistics provides *estimates* and not exact measurements, the number of significant figures in the uncertainty is never greater than 2 (and then only if the first digit is 1), and rounding of uncertainties is always done to the larger number. The relative percentage error in my friends determination is thus: 0.0010 ppm / 5.2204 ppm = 0.0001916 => 0.02% Few things betray ignorance faster than reporting *insignificant* figures. HTH Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
| Tags |
| express , statistics |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| real-time PCR statistics | eej28 | BioStatistics Forum | 0 | 01-26-2010 05:54 AM |
| Real-time PCR statistics | eej28 | PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum | 0 | 01-26-2010 05:53 AM |
| Statistics, Thermodynamics and Single Atoms | Physics Forum | 3 | 01-28-2006 09:34 PM | |
| express | Dr. Barry Panaretou | Protocols and Methods Forum | 0 | 09-14-2004 07:25 PM |
| New online refresher course in statistics | Statistics.Com | Botany Forum | 4 | 12-08-2003 05:28 PM |