| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I woke up early - as I sometimes do - and was screwing around with my new PC TV wonder card... SciFi channel was doing a Star Trek Classic mini-marathon, so I watched a couple of episodes. One episode that had of course watched before but not for a long time was the "Tholian Web". It's most notable visual was the two ships who linked up and then drew a netting with some kind of light beam, slowly enclosing the Enterprise. Ok, so part of the deal here is that the ship they are investigating has a dead crew who seemed to all have gone crazy. The ship is in a /transitory/ state, a kind of glowing greenish color. And when they are transporting 3 of the 4 people in the search party they barely get back. Kirk stays behind, and they try to transport him but the ship then totally disappears. Two things: (1) This episode seems directly linked to the /Philadelphia Experiment/ -- the glowing ship, and people who later experienced dementia after going through the phase change. (2) They talk about there being multiple universes which interface with each other. In fact, they have to wait around, for the two universes to come into phase so that they can rescue Kirk. And they talk like this is common physics. But I thought that our own physics didn't even think of such ideas as the multiverse until David Deutsche in 1995! Was the dude just watching a lot of Star Trek or what ?! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Remote Wonder wrote: Nobody here knows.. try a newsgroup forum that deals with Star Trek and you might find out. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Morituri-Max wrote: Could you be more negative ? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Remote Wonder <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: Awww come off it, sci-fi's had multiple universes for decades, much longer than star trek. Heck, even the lion, witch, and wardrobe dealt with multiple worlds. (In fact, the prequel to Lion Witch and Wardrobe actually showed a few more worlds... The evil witch in LW&W came from one of these) Original star trek did the multiverse thing 3 times at least as it is! The bloke from the anti-matter universe fighting his normal-matter self, the evil dimension where kirk gets transported during YATM (which later becomes a bit of an ongoing thread in DS9), and the tholian web. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Remote Wonder <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: What you watched is irrelevant, Remote Wonder. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Illogical, Remote Wonder, given that things can't "disappear". On what basis do you make that claim, Remote Wonder? What does that have to do with Physics, Remote Wonder? You are erroneously presupposing that "the dude" was watching a lot of Star Trek, Remote Wonder. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Remote Wonder <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered users see links. ]>... There's still a great deal of uncertainty of even what the Philidelphia experiment was. It's highly classified, and hasn't been repeated since (that we know of :-D). Einstein theorized about the possibility. Science Fiction often tries to use the language of science to make their fiction more credible. It's not so unusual that science might occaisionally use the language of science fiction to describe their technologies. For example, a new engine designed for intersteller exploration uses "Ion Drive" - which got the name because it used ionized particles of fuel to achieve extremely high fuel efficiency. On the other hand, they credited it to Star Trek. In 2001 the computer HAL got its name by taking the previous letters in the alphabet from IBM. The initials WNT were the letters following VMS. Many scientists developed an interest in science as a result of watching star trek, and a number of other contemporary programs which tried to promote interest in engineering. The one I always found fascinating was when the famous Sci-Fi novelest Isaac Asimov described Positronic brains back in a time when the leading technology was vacuum tubes. Ironically, he wasn't too far off. Vacuum tube theory presumed that electrons flowed from positive to negative, based on the "wind" generated within the vacuum tube which could be measured with a wind vane. When transisters locked the protons and neutrons in place, it was discovered that the electrons traveled from negative to positive. This shift in logic, along with the transister itself, made it possible to design extremely small and efficient switches and gates, the foundation of modern integrated circuits. When I have read the works of H.G. Wells, and some of the other popular science fiction writers, it's often interesting to note how many of their predictions came true, even though they did not have the language to describe it at the time. Even Nostradamus seems to have been surprisingly accurate with many of his prophesies, yet we can only see them in hindsight because we don't have the language for the event until after the event occurrs. At the same time, when a prophesy event occurrs, it is often the prophesy that gives the language. We see the squiggles that were translated to Hister, but they don't make sense until AFTER Adolf Hitler came to power. According to Nostradamus, the next dictator, MABUS, was supposed to come into power after "New City in Flames and Smoke". Many have claimed that this was a play on osaMA BUSh. Personally, I think it's a bit of a stretch. The other possibility, if you handwrite MABUS without lifting the pen, you could also see WBUSh. Again, this is a stretch. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| [Only registered users see links. ] (Rex Ballard) wrote in message news:<29d7c061.0409090801.4624392@posting.google.c om>... <snip> <snip> It has been known since the 1890's that electrons are negatively charged particles that are repelled by negative electrodes and attracted to positive ones, just as Coulomb's law (which dates from the 18th century) dictates. It is true that the current is considered to flow in the opposite direction from the electrons, but this is a result of the convention for assigning positive and negative charges (due to Franklin). I never heard about wind vane experiments. The electrons would transfer momentum to a vane that was placed in an electron beam, but the momentum transfer would be small. If you could make a vane rotate by this means, it would rotate in the same direction as the electrons. All of this has been a well understood part of vacuum tube theory from the beginning. Well, more precisely, the early experimenters with vacuum tubes, de Forest et al, didn't understand very much about what they were doing, but that was because of their lack of background in basic physics. The physics was certainly available for anyone who wanted to delve into it, as some (like Langmuir) shortly did. Vacuum tube theory was certainly understood well by every one, including electrical engineers, by the time computers were being built in the 1940's. There is no contradiction with transistors, in which electrons travel from negative to positive and the current flows in the opposite direction, just as in a vacuum tube. The only difference is that semiconductors also have holes, which behave like positive particles (although it is still negative electrons that are in motion). Nessuno |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Remote Wonder <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered users see links. ]>... A clever man, Dr. Asimov... Your statement is crap. Benjamin Franklin (18th century) postulated that there were two polarities of electricity and coined the terms "positive" and "negative," with electric current flowing from the positive to the negative. [Only registered users see links. ] Later Hittorf (19th century) showed that the charge carriers moved from the cathode (negative terminal) to the anode, and thus had *negative* charges on them. [Only registered users see links. ] BTW, he used the cathode rays to cast shadows, not to turn a "wind vane." Protons are "locked in place" by chemical bonds - in this state they are called "hydrogen." Neutrons still cannot be "locked in place." Transistors are nearly pure crystals of semi-metals, but the carefully controlled *impurities* do not carry the same number of electrons as the majority of the atoms with which they share the crystalline lattice. This introduces localized excesses/deficits of electrons - a local electron deficit is called a "hole," and can carry electrical current as well as any electron, only in the oppposite direction. It is the localized charges/deficits that are "locked in place" by the crystalline lattice - that's why there are no *liquid* transistors. Credit that to photolithography. The original semiconductor devices were comparatively macroscopic - my first transistors were large enough that their number could be printed on the metal "top hats" that encased them. Not very efficient, though - ran hot and ate batteries. The circuits that used them were simple scaled-down versions of vacuum-tube circuits - multivibrators, filters, oscillators, single and multi-stage amplifiers, etc. BTW, the letter "e" is not used in the word "transistor." When you misspell a key word in your thesis, it casts shadows on your credibility. The Internet and Usenet are killing the art of bullshitting. There are so many people around who know what's what that you can't get away with a gross misstatement for long. Just the other day, CBS news trotted out four 'newly discovered' documents that appeared embarrassing to Republicans, and within 16 hours(!) a number of various document experts, military clerks, computer specialists, typists, etc. had weighed in on various blogs exposing enough inconsistencies in the papers to support a case for fraud. Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:01:43 -0700, Rex Ballard wrote: The fact that electrons are negatively charged was demonstrated during the 1800's, many years before the transistor was developed. -- Mathew M. <[Only registered users see links. ].org> GPG public key ID: 0x3DDC1413 This post contains a chemical or chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm. This (these) chemical(s) may be harmful to your health. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Rex Ballard <r.e.ballard@usa.net> wrote: Haven't you seen the film? It was a radar invisibility experiment that went... a little kaka... In the blink of a cosmic clock they went from 1940s navy grunts to.... people lost in 1985 after they fell through a hole in hyperspace where the experiment had been repeated... Philadelphia experiment 2 on the other hand was a complete pile of wank. |
| Tags |
| tholian , web |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FW: [OT] Looking for a protocol for chinese style dried plums! | Deanne Bell | Protocols and Methods Forum | 1 | 08-03-2004 09:11 PM |
| [OT] albo | Speed | Forum Chimica | 1 | 02-20-2004 06:02 PM |
| [OT] scogliere il silicone | Simone | Forum Chimica | 7 | 02-12-2004 03:26 PM |
| [OT] Archeolibro | Jack Malmostoso | Forum Chimica | 4 | 02-04-2004 05:32 AM |
| [OT] Per Walter Peris | Albert Ruggi | Forum Chimica | 0 | 01-27-2004 04:03 PM |