| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| When a bank is curved at the certain angle theta to prevent a car in uniform circular motion from skidding irrespective of any frictional force, the horizontal component of the normal force equals mv^2/r, or the centripetal force. I understand the concept of this, but I have a question: Where does the horizontal component of the car's weight figure into all this? It seems that the horizontal component of the weight of the car would be keeping the car from skidding off the track (thanks to the gravitational force), yet textbooks only say that the horizontal component of the normal force does this. I know that mathematically the two are related, but I am having trouble understanding the concept. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Dear Anebt: "Anebt" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:m3PLc.9157$[Only registered users see links. ].atl.earthli nk.net... uniform centripetal would gravitational normal I think the problem you are hosting comes from the use of the word "normal". In physics, this word means "perpendicular to" something. In the context of this problem, the track surface can have a meaningful normal formed to it. The component of gravity normal to the surface ( g * cos( theta ) ) simply describes the supporting force of the track. The component of gravity parallel to the surface ( g* sin( theta ) ) describes the radial acceleration of the vehicle around the track. Imagine if the track were around the Earth, then ramped up to 90 degrees. The only way to keep the same relationship with the centerline of the track would be to be in orbit at that altitude. I hope this helps. David A. Smith |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| > You simply want the "weight vector" of the car to be normal to the road surface. You already know the downward (vertical) force of a stationary car. You can compute what the skidding (force vector parallel to the roadway in the downhill direction) and now you simply have to offset that with a force vector brought on by radial acceleration in the opposite (uphill) direction. Don't worry about naming the forces, that can lead to confusion especially on this newgroup. Just decide what the objective is -- in htis case it's to have the total forces acting on the car be normal to the raod surface -- then calculate the circumstances that'll creat that set of circumstances. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:12:50 GMT, "Anebt" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: i had trouble understanding this due to ill-informed teachers but centrifugal force has a part to play in this. i suggest you read this entire article at NASA (who surely must know what they are talking about) [Only registered users see links. ] |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Anebt" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:m3PLc.9157$[Only registered users see links. ].atl.earthli nk.net... uniform would gravitational Of the two forces acting on the car (weight (W) and normal force (N), only N has a horizontal component. W acts vertically downwards and so its horizontal component is zero. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 18:02:00 GMT, "thomas guild" <[Only registered users see links. ].uk> wrote: that is true from the point of view of a linear inertial (non-accelerating ) reference frame. in the circular or rotational reference frame things look slightly differently. there are two main horizontal forces at play in this reference frame. there is an outward centre fleeing force acting on the car pushing it outwards away from the centre in a radial direction. this is the centrifugal force and is equal to (m*v*v )/ r . where v is the velocity of the car in the tangential direction. obvisouly as v increases so does the centrifugal force on the car. the other horizontal force is provided by the friction of the tyres on the road and acts directly towards the centre (ie it is a centripetal force). while the car stays on the bank these two forces are equal and opposite and the car stays on the bank. however the friction provided by the tyres has a maximum level beyonw which it cannot go (determined by the material and the surface area) as soon as the velocity - v - of the car increases to a certain level the centrifugal force will overcome the centripetal frictional force and the car will fly off the bank. this can easily be seen by sitting a draughts (checkers) piece on a turntable. the piece will stay on the turntable until the rpms (revolutions per minute ) of the turntable exceeds some level (eg 70 rpm). at that point the centrifugal force (m*v*v/ r) will overcome the frictional centripetal force and the piece will fly off the turntable in a radial direction. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Anebt" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:m3PLc.9157$[Only registered users see links. ].atl.earthli nk.net... uniform Make that "the horizontal component of the force equals mv^2/r." The word "normal" in physics (as in analytical geometry) means "perpendicular to the surface." There are two forces acting from the vehicle onto the ground here: the weight (W = m*g) due to gravity acts vertically downward and the inertial force (F = m*v*2/r, sometimes called "centrifugal") that results from the changing direction of the velocity and acts horizontally (unless the vehicle is simultaneously going uphill or downhill). Each of these forces is a vector - meaning it has both magnitude AND direction. When you add them together, the *net* force N is also a vector. It often helps to draw a diagram: CAR #------F=m*v^2/r |\ | \ | \ | \ | \ | \ W=m*g N=[F]+[W] Ideally, you would like the *net* force N to be perpendicular to the ground. A little trigonometry will show you that the angle theta of the pavement should equal the angle between the weight vector W and the *net* force vector N. gravitational "Weight" has *no* horizontal component. It acts straight down by definition of "down." Hope this helps... Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "tadchem" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ]... definition I was thinking about the examples with inclined planes found in textbooks. The horizontal component of the weight provides the force that pulls a sled down the plane, etc. In these cases the horizontal component of weight pulls something downward. I guess that a web site I just found answered my question, at least in theory: "Since the car is not sliding down the bank, only components of the normal are examined." Thanks to everyone for your answers. Source for quote: [Only registered users see links. ] centripetal/lessoncentripetalforce.asp |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Anebt" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:r60Mc.10200$[Only registered users see links. ].atl.earthl ink.net... weight In such cases the force acting downhill isn't the -horizontal- component of the weight (which is zero after all!), but the component acting parallel to the slope. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ]... the centripetal normal am only N You seem to be analysing the case of a car cornering on a horizontal surface. In the case of a banked surface, friction isn't the only horizontal force: The horizontal component of the normal force provides an additional sideways force, which allows the car the possibility of cornering at a higher speed than it could on the flat. TG |
| Tags |
| banked , beginner , question , turns |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about Hypothetical Type of Thermal Injury. Explained | Radium | Protein Forum | 13 | 12-19-2005 08:32 PM |
| Just a big question... | rahemanvelji@yahoo.ca | Physics Forum | 8 | 05-09-2005 08:44 PM |
| Beginner's Question about Halliday/Resnick | Anebt | Physics Forum | 0 | 12-03-2004 08:56 PM |
| Sci.chem FAQ - Part 1 of 7 | Bruce Hamilton | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 01-15-2004 08:06 AM |