| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| There was an experimental aircraft developed by Germany in WW2, the Ju390 V2, which flew non-stop from Europe to US east coast and back again. It's ceiling was in the low 20k. It had six engines developing 1700 hp each, currently under discussion at the moderated group soc.history.war.world-war-ii, subject 'German Bombers to NYC'. I want to compare the 390's power to the 17000 pounds thrust available from each of the eight Pratt & Whitney engines TF33-P-3/103 turbofans on the B52. How does this 17000 pounds translate to hp? BTW, a most fascinating site for the B52, especially in the charts appearing about 2/3 of the way down is [Only registered users see links. ] TIA. -bg- [Only registered users see links. ] |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| There is no direct conversion between hp and thrust. These are two different things. It basically depends on the efficiency of the propellers. That would help determine how many pounds of thrust they would make. Horse Power is the indication of how much power the engine makes. Pounds of thrust is how much pushing force the engine imparts to the aircraft. As you can see, the difference between the two is the propeller for the prop engine. DaveL "**bg**" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:JmQuc.632435$oR5.519689@pd7tw3no... to from B52. appearing |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| **bg** wrote: <snippage> Dimensional analysis. In what units (M,L,T etc) are the two quantities expressed? Remember that pounds of thrust is a force, and that you have to take the drag (another force) on the aircraft into account. (There are four forces operating on an aircraft; lift vs. weight, and thrust vs. drag.) The hp applied as thrust is only useful in telling you how fast the aircraft will move at a constant velocity _if_ you know the drag (assuming lift and weight also balance). Mark L. Fergerson |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| **bg** <info@thelittlecanadaheadphoneband.ca> wrote in message news:JmQuc.632435$oR5.519689@pd7tw3no... to from B52. appearing Nevertheless the ' effective power ' can be calculated by knowing how heavy the planes are and how fast they accelerate although this takes into the opposing forces of drag. Best |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "**bg**" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:JmQuc.632435$oR5.519689@pd7tw3no... Wrong. [Only registered users see links. ] Only one Ju390 was ever completed and flown, (Prototype V1) in the bomber configuration. A second was started but not completed. The designed range was 9700 km in the Reconnaisance version, but that was ever actually performed. Given a bomb payload, the Ju390 version 1 would never have completed the Berlin-New York round trip. Given only one completed test flight, the "service ceiling" was never established. It probably would have been limited by Germany's available human factors technology - how high could the *crew* stand to go and remain for 20-30 hours (without pressure suits and with limited O2 availability)? The revelation that Germany *was* working on a long-range heavy bomber that *could* have reached NYC from Berlin caused a lot of sweaty American palms, however: [Only registered users see links. ] Make that 1970 hp. from B52. It doesn't. Apples aren't oranges. Horsepower is "power" - energy times time. Thrust is force - energy per unit distance. Given a good hydraulic jack I could generate 17000 pounds of thrust with my personal 1/4 horsepower body. Just don't expect it *fast*. Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:07:32 -0400, "tadchem" [snip] I think what he is talking about is this constant force from each of 8 engines, sustained at some constant velocity and altitude (cruising conditions). This would be force X distance/time, and would equate to power. The choice of units could give an answer in hp. 33,000 foot pounds per minute is one hp. Or, stated differently, 33,000 pounds applied to an object, in the direction of its velocity, and moving it at one foot per minute is producing one hp. One engine, producing 16,500 pounds of thrust and moving an object 2 feet per minute would equate to one hp. All 8 engines moving this object 2 feet per minute would produce 8 hp. Now, increase the speed to 36,900 feet per minute (450 mph) and you get 147,600 hp equivalent...unless I miss keyed my calculator. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "**bg**" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:JmQuc.632435 Thrust and power ratings are probably done at a standard altitude and velocity. The two are not constant and depend on many variable. But the instantaneous power of an engine is basically the thrust it produces multiplied by the planes air speed. 17000 pounds at 300 mph would equate to 13,600 hp. I don't think they push that hard, but that's an example. |
| Tags |
| b52 , bomber , converting , horse , power , thrust |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Human Cytome Project - Update 24 Jan. 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 1 | 08-01-2010 02:18 PM |
| A Needless Waste of Power & Health | Bjay | Physics Forum | 1 | 01-04-2004 01:17 AM |
| energy storage for PV systems | Mike Darrett | Chemistry Forum | 169 | 08-02-2003 04:14 PM |