| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Most of you are probably familiar with attempts to decimalize time, and circles: I think that so many problems were involved that the whole idea has finally been abandoned. Besides; time and circles have their _own_ ‘decimal systems': The duodecimal; base twelve system for non-digital, analogue clock faces, and the sexagesimal; base 60 system by which circles, and Earth's equator are divided into 360 degrees, and _decimals_ thereof. If they knew the world was somewhere near round, they might have done better with an angular measure, instead of choosing the meter as the standard for linear length, for all men for all time. Not that there is anything really wrong with using meters for length; but a meter stick's just not as convenient to manipulate as a foot ruler, and a cubic meter is even much less convenient to handle than a cubic foot. A cubic foot of water weighs about 62.4#, and that's pretty hefty: Imagine trying to jockey a cubic meter of water around. That's more than 27 cubic feet isn't it? Anyway angular measure has its uses; especially for time. Linear measure can be represented as _linear_ length on circles, and/or as _angular_ circular measure: This can be accomplished with plane trigonometry too: With which we can plot various distance and angular aspects of plane circles on mutually perpendicular x and y coordinates; to get the length of curves and tangents, as well as their angular changes in direction. Maybe a millionth of one degree as measured on Earth's surface would have been a good standard for length? How long would that be? Anyways, a meter's inconveniently long for measuring short distances, and the decimeter or centimeter's too short: Square and cubic meters are just too inconvenietly much for almost _all_ practical purposes. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I thought taht that was the original definition, by the French, of the meter; someone recently wrote a book about that problem! [Only registered users see links. ] (Donald G. Shead) wrote in message news:<48402bae.0404131525.7de54bcd@posting.google. com>... [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] --Give Earth a Trickier Dick Cheeny -- out of office, after GIGA years. [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] |
| Tags |
| angular , measure |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PHYSICS, Ex Chao Ordo | Donald G. Shead | Physics Forum | 2 | 01-03-2012 10:26 AM |
| GNU units and units.dat; Units of Measurement and Unit Conversion | James Redford | Physics Forum | 0 | 07-31-2005 12:08 PM |
| Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! | caltechdude | Physics Forum | 428 | 01-21-2005 09:39 PM |
| Angular measure | Donald G. Shead | Physics Forum | 5 | 04-17-2004 05:24 AM |
| The Special Theory of Relativity is dead | Robert Calvert | Physics Forum | 162 | 01-05-2004 06:54 AM |