| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I made up two designs for perpetual motion machines of the second kind. That is, one that converts heat from a single isothermal source directly into useful work, thus lowering the entropy of the universe in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. I'd REALLY like to know why they don't work. I've done a little reading into Maxwell's Demon and information theory lately, but I still can't figure out the answer to these specific designs. Here they are: [Only registered users see links. ] I'd really like to do my physics undergraduate thesis on the topic of perpetual motion of the second kind this semester, so any answers you may have would help me a lot. Thanks! -Ben |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Ben Peterson" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:<bv7pjn$lt2$[Only registered users see links. ].umn.edu>... Machine #1: The pressure of the gas is constant, so the piston should not move over macroscopic distances, apart the small fluctuations. But piston and generator are outside the isothermal bath, so you have to show us that they are not at a different temperature. Also, you should provvide an example of useful work in the drawing (like lifting a weight). There are examples of extracting work from brownian motion that use asymmetric systems (like a piston that move only in one direction). Machine #2: The mirror has a temperature and emits and absorbs thermal radiation. So do the two points. I would expect that the thermal radiation from the mirror affects the blue and red point. If no work is done to keep the temperatures of the mirror and the points constant, then the system will end up at equilibrium. (A mirror that reflects all EM frequencies does not exist.) OC |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Ben Peterson wrote: I invented something similar: [Only registered users see links. ] If you find some comprehensive explanations why it doesn't work I'm interested. Bernhard -- Webspace; Low end Serverhousing ab 15 e, etc.: [Only registered users see links. ] Linux Admin/Programmierer: [Only registered users see links. ] |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In article <bv7pjn$lt2$[Only registered users see links. ].umn.edu>, Ben Peterson <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: In machine #1, you don't even need the piston and generator because there will be thermal noise anyway. Put an oscilliscope across a resistor and you can see it. Sensors are often cooled to reduce thermal noise. But what that also means in your machine is sometimes the generator will act like a motor and move the piston against incoming molecules. Expect them to gain as much energy as they lose, and the temperature to remain constant. Turning thermal noise into useful work is another matter; diodes have thermal noise, too. The second law can be violated in microscopic scales, but a perpetual motion machine that does something is a macroscopic device. Machine #2 is quite clever. Thermal radiation from the mirror will go in every direction, and any blackbody will absorb as well as it emits. But I can't think of a good reason to kill a transient dT/dt>0. -- "In any case, don't stress too much--cortisol inhibits muscular hypertrophy. " -- Eric Dodd |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Bernhard Kuemel" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:4017ad94$[Only registered users see links. ]... may Others have mentioned that the machines all violate the second law of thermodynamics. To put it another way, none of the processes that are to be used can operate at 100% efficiency. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Franz Heymann" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: I break the law daily. Not the second law (twice a day I drive faster than the posted speed limit on this bridge: [Only registered users see links. ] - the site is kind of humerous) but what's the difference? Does anyone know where I can get me a demon like the one Maxwell had? Thanks! |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| tadchem wrote: Encyclopedia of Irish Erotic Pottery Compendium of French Military Triumphs The Big Book of British Gourmet Cooking Biographies of Black African Mathematicians Directory of Mexican Birth Control Clinics -- Uncle Al [Only registered users see links. ] (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net! |
| Tags |
| kind , motion , perpetual , question |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FFiMP: Misconceptions about Special Relativity | Jan Gooral | Physics Forum | 0 | 05-22-2008 02:53 PM |
| What is Gravity? | sdr@sdrodrian.com | Physics Forum | 1 | 01-27-2008 01:53 PM |
| The Achilles Heel of String Theory. | S D Rodrian | Physics Forum | 7 | 07-08-2006 02:40 PM |
| Question on Perpetual Motion of Second Kind | Ben Peterson | Chemistry Forum | 29 | 02-03-2004 04:59 AM |
| 21st Century Dynamics | Donald G. Shead | Physics Forum | 5 | 08-14-2003 11:43 PM |