Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

 Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.

# If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

## If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . . - Physics Forum

### If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . . - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.

#1
09-28-2003, 10:42 AM
 Interesting Ian Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

Suppose that our Universe contained only 2 objects, perhaps 2 spheres.
Suppose they are separated by some distance, say 10 light seconds, and they
are orbiting around each other. I'm just wondering whether it would be
meaningful to claim they are actually orbiting around each other since there
is no third perspective? Also would they experience centrafugal force (or
alternatively would they need centrapetal force)?

#2
09-28-2003, 12:00 PM
 Martin Hogbin Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

"Interesting Ian" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:cWydb.1490\$[Only registered users see links. ].net...

what you are saying is 'what would our universe be like
if it were different from how it is?'

Mach's principle. Newton (amongst others) noticed
that, although linear motion at a constant speed appears
to be entirely relative, rotation (and acceleration in
general) appears to be absolute.

Ernst Mach proposed, unfortunately rather vaguely, that
the absolute nature of acceleration might be due to the
effect of matter in the universe. In Newtonian physics
it is fairly simple to put this general idea into a clear
mathematical form. Linear acceleration could, for
example, be relative to the centre of mass of the
universe at any instant.

The best theory of space and time that we have today
is Einstein's general theory of relativity (GR).
Unfortunately, there are several ways of expressing
Mach's principle in terms of GR. Even after you have
chosen one such way, whether it actually applies
may depend on the 'shape' of the universe.

objects formed what is known as a Wheeler-Einstein-
Mach (WEM) universe (I am no expert on these
matters but I believe that this would depend on the
detailed descriptions of the two masses) then they
would themselves determine their subsequent
moments dependent on their initial dispositions.

I am sorry if this answer seems rather vague but
there are no easy answers, not even any easy
questions.

Martin Hogbin

#3
09-28-2003, 01:22 PM
 Interesting Ian Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

"Martin Hogbin" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:bl6ih0\$s9l\$[Only registered users see links. ]...
they
there
(or
Hi,

Thanks for your response. I don't know much about physics, I'm much more of
a philosopher. I'm very interested in the philosophy of this 18th century
philosopher called George Berkeley. He argued against the existence of an
absolute space (as well as time). It's very interesting you should mention
Mach because apparently Mach's philosophy of science was identical to
Berkeley's, and he reached it apparently without knowing anything about
Berkeley's philosophy.

Quote:
 "In Einstein's Universe, which has no reference point or common center of mass, inertial forces such as centrifugal forces for example, are generated even in the absence of the fixed stars, in contrast to the earlier relativity theories of Berkeley and Mach. A spinning Earth would, in a mysterious way, generate centrifugal force at the equator even if all other matter in the Universe was removed. This reverts back to Berkeley's argument, "How then can we say that the Earth is spinning and relative to what?""
I have to say that I absolutely agree with Berkeley. The only way we could
say the earth is spinning would be relative to space itself. I, like
Berkeley, find this nonsensical (incidentally I am also an immaterialist
like Berkeley, so this should not be surprising). And I also find it
interesting that Einsteins *relativity* predicts an absolute space!
{confused}

#4
09-28-2003, 01:28 PM
 Jim Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

Interesting Ian wrote:
You don't need two objects, one will suffice - how could you tell
whether it was rotating or not? I believe this to do with Mach's Principle?
Jim

#5
09-28-2003, 01:38 PM
 Interesting Ian Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

"Jim" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:jrBdb.1597\$[Only registered users see links. ].net...
they
there
(or

Yes considering one object makes it simpler. Well you couldn't could you?
That's what I don't understand. It could only be rotating relative to
space, but philosophically I find that hard to countenance.

I believe this to do with Mach's Principle?

I really don't know anything about Mach. I do know just about everything
about Berkeley's philosophy of science though, and Mach's ideas are supposed
to be identical to it.

#6
09-28-2003, 03:00 PM
 tony Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

>
If the obect were spherelike, and if your one object universe had physical
'laws' like this one, I think an observer on that sphere could determine if it
was rotating by experimenting on its surface. Take it to fast absolute
rotation, and think about differences in gravity at the axis of rotation and at
the object's equater

ajw.
#7
09-28-2003, 04:35 PM
 Interesting Ian Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

"tony" <ajw27703@wmconnect.comremoove> wrote in message
news:[Only registered users see links. ]...
you?
supposed
if it
and at

Yes if physical laws are unchanged. But the spinning would only be known
through it's effect. So we either have an effect with no cause, or
alternatively you might claim that the spinning just simple *IS* the
variation in gravity. But if the earth were the only object in the
Universe, and gravity varied accross its surface in said manner, then we
would simply take this as the way gravity is.

#8
09-28-2003, 05:25 PM
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

"Jim" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:jrBdb.1597\$[Only registered users see links. ].net...
they
there
(or
Principle?

If a tree falls in the forest...

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

#9
09-29-2003, 12:41 PM
 David Granteer Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

All of physics depends on the existence of a coordinate system. This is
usually implicit. The example you give has only two measures, the distance
between the objects and the diameter of the objects. If the diameter of the
objects is taken as the unit of distance, then the only measurable value is
the distance between them, in multiples of that diameter. There is no way
to determine if they are orbiting one another. There is no way to determine
a measure of time, unless the distance between them is periodic (which it
probably would be if they were orbiting one another as viewed in an external
cood sys.) Then the unit of time would be the period of the variation of
distance between them.

"Interesting Ian" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:cWydb.1490\$[Only registered users see links. ].net...
they
there

#10
09-30-2003, 12:57 AM
 ghytrfvbnmju7654 Guest Posts: n/a
If there were only 2 objects in the Universe . . .

"Interesting Ian" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:<95Edb.1937\$[Only registered users see links. ].net>...

Don't forget the Coriolis effect!

 Tags objects , universe

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home General Science Forums     Biology Forum     New Member Introductions Forum     Chemistry Forum         Organic Chemistry Forum     Physics Forum     General Science Questions and Layperson Board         Science and Religion Forum         Zoology Forum     Environmental Sciences and Issues General Forum     Chit Chat         Science and Lab Jokes     Article Discussion     Molecular Biology News and Announcements         Conferences , Symposiums and Meetings         Molecular Station Suggestion Forum         Instructions for Posting, Help, and Frequently Asked Questions     Science News and Views         Molecular Biology Lectures and Videos     Science Careers         Post-doctoral         Medical School         Ph.D Doctor of Philosophy         Science Jobs Forum Molecular Research Topics Forum     PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum         Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum     Bioinformatics         BioStatistics Forum     Molecular Biology Techniques         Molecular Cloning Forum         Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Forum         Agarose Gel Electrophoresis Forum         BioPhysics Forum         Gene Therapy     Cell Biology and Cell Culture         Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Necrosis Forum         Flow Cytometry Forum         Transfection Forum         Confocal - Microscopy Imaging Techniques         Immunology and Host-Pathogen Interactions         Signalling Biology         Stem Cell Forum     Basic Lab Protocols and Techniques         SDS-PAGE Gel Electrophoresis Forum     DNA Techniques         DNA Extraction Forum         cDNA Forum     Epigenetics Forum: DNA Methylation, Histone and Chromatin Study         ChIP Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Forum     Protein Science         Antibody Forum             Immunoprecipitation Forum         Western Blot Forum         Protein Crystallography Forum         Recombinant Protein Forum         ELISA Assay Forum         Protein Forum     Proteomics Forum         Peptide Forum         Mass Spectrometry Forum         2-D Gel Electrophoresis Forum     Omics and Genomics Forum         Microarrays Forum         Genomics Forum     RNA Techniques Forum         RNAi and SiRNA Forum     Histology Forum         Immunohistochemistry Forum         Immunocytochemistry Forum         Electron Microscopy Forum         Immunofluorescence Forum     Protocols and Methods Forum     Molecular Biology Articles and Protocols     Animal and Molecular Model Systems         Drosophila Forum         Yeast Forum         Zebrafish Forum         Botany Forum         C Elegans Forum         Arabidopsis and Plant Biology         Microbiology Forum         Knockout Mouse Forum     Chromatography Forum Products and Vendor Discussion     Molecular Biology Products and Vendors         Bad Product/Service? Post Here         Lab Equipment Discussion and Reviews Regional Molecular Biology Discussion     Forum Chemie     Forum Biologie     Forum Biologia     Forum Chimica     Forum Physik     Forum De Chimie     Forum De Physique     Forum Chemia     中国人分子的生物学论坛 Chinese     Greek Molecular Biology Forums     分子生物学のフォーラム Japanese     ميدان فارسى. Persian Molecular Biology     [أربيك] علم ساحة- Arabic     Forum de Biologie Moleculaire     Forum Biologia Molecolare     Forum die Molekularbiologie     Foro Biologia Molecular

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post sdr@sdrodrian.com Physics Forum 1 01-27-2008 01:53 PM S D Rodrian Physics Forum 7 07-08-2006 02:40 PM SDR Physics Forum 5 02-16-2005 06:41 AM Kazmer Ujvarosy Botany Forum 0 05-21-2004 06:50 AM Kazmer Ujvarosy Forum Biologie 0 05-21-2004 06:32 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 PM.

 Contact Us - Molecular Biology - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top