"Martin Hogbin" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:bknb79$ds3$[Only registered users see links. ]...
news:jqtbb.7153$[Only registered users see links. ].prodigy.com ...
Here I go again Martin(:-) _You_ are perhaps one of the goofiest goofoffs
yet: By wasting internet "bandwidth" improperly; just to get your digs in.
There appears to be _no_ redeeming value here whatsoever: Either for your
cause or mine. Don't you have any opinion, or have anything to say about the
I'm thinking that with the consistent (fps) units of the foot-pound-second
system of weights and measures: Acceleration [a] is not inversely
proportional to 1/m; but [a] _is_ proportional to f/m!
Therefore [f] is not _equal_ to [ma]! A body's mass [m] is proportional to
the ratio of the (net) force [f], divided by the acceleration [a] that
occurs; due to that force: Therefore f/a = 1# secē/foot = w/g = 5.33#
secē/5.33 feet =32# secē/32 feet....
So since mass [m] is proportional to the ratios: m = f/a = w/g: