Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > General Science Forums > Physics Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Physics Forum Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Suppose I'm right

Suppose I'm right - Physics Forum

Suppose I'm right - Physics Forum. Discuss and ask physics questions, kinematics and other physics problems.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-24-2003, 06:22 AM
QDurham
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppose I'm right

>The central method for coming up with force laws and field equations is to
extremize the action integral usually defined in terms of a
Langrangian function. For this you need a form of calculus for solving extremal
problems in functionals. This is the so-called calculus of
variations. You can't do physics without it, or something mathematically
equivalent.
C'mon Bob. English. Unless, that is, you are simply trying to impress.

Quent

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-24-2003, 11:04 AM
Donald G. Shead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppose I'm right


"QDurham" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:[Only registered users see links. ].com...
to
extremal
It's easier to think that a calculus of variations is necessary to solve
Newton's a = (vt-vi)/t and g; than it is to solve Galileo's g = 2s/tē =
32'/secē !


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-26-2003, 06:08 PM
Danny Deger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppose I'm right


"Donald G. Shead" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:5kvTa.11960$[Only registered users see links. ].pro digy.com...
that

Donald, you might be disappointed to learn that the tools you used to build
bridges were developed from calculus. For example if I apply a bending
moment on an "I" beam, you have an equation that will predict the stress and
strain. That equation was developed with calculus.

Danny Deger



Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-26-2003, 09:43 PM
Donald G. Shead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Suppose I'm right


"Danny Deger" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:bfug4c$iu8rl$[Only registered users see links. ].uni-berlin.de...
build
and
Danny m'boy: You might get somebody to believe that line; but I know better:

Even back in the days when I used to joke that "6 munts ago I couldn't even
spell "ingineer", and now I are one" I knew better: That the calculus was a
crock; used by professional engineers only to impress other scientists that
their professional status was [almost] on a par with theirs.

For the first few years those of us who hadn't made the grade yet, studied
and carried little shirt pocket manuals that contained all the essentials
needed: They had all the _simple beam_ formulas for designing with concrete
and steel; as well as tables and mathematical formulas: They even had
diagrams of finite elements showing how they led to the calculus.

That was learning engineering from the 'grass roots'; with a little help
from the sliderule: I remember the instructions that came with my first
sliderule predicted that learning the proper use of it would be the most
important thing that I'd ever learn: Which it WAS! Limited of course to
three significant figures which is "close enough for bridge work".

Then of course we soon had access to main-frame computers where virtually
all aspects of design could be carried out by anyone with an optimum
knowledge of design and construction; just by filling in essential data.

I was (among) the first to realize that electronic calculators were a boon
to engineering; especially in that they could take the drudgery and tendency
to err out of it: In particular, programmable calculators could iterate
quickly, and store many program steps; which eliminated such errors; to the
n'th degree.

With my TI 59 card programmable calculator I soon had readily available
programs for virtually all of the basic formulas in most of the manuals used
by "Highway Senior Engineers (Bridge Design)"; of my ilk. I could do _some_
things with these, quicker and better than they could.

Since I've retired I've been told that the pound is [legally] a unit of
mass, and of course you know I don't swallow that any better than I do your
claim about formulas being derived with the calculus.

Don't go away mad Dan; I'm not(:-) We'll both survive learning that the
measure of mass is inertia, and the calculus is just a sophisticated way of
plotting the infinitesimal coordinates of infinitesimal ratios; that
represent changing rates; of changes in motion.


Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
suppose


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Life is suppose to be easier. jerseysurfer66 Chromatography Forum 0 06-11-2010 12:27 PM
Suppose you are using a 40x, 100x, 400x, 1000x microscope to study the human... stephie Confocal - Microscopy Imaging Techniques 0 09-13-2009 09:17 PM
suppose, some people on earth? ElectrK Physics Forum 0 06-25-2009 05:17 PM
Suppose that you are using a thermometer to measure temperatures...? summer Chemistry Forum 0 06-25-2009 12:17 PM
suppose you are viewing a Gram-stained field of... desire w Confocal - Microscopy Imaging Techniques 0 04-02-2007 01:25 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.13253 seconds with 16 queries