| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Science Groups New! | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Peptide Forum Peptide Forum. Ask and discuss questions on peptide protocols, custom peptide synthesis, peptide identification and peptide sequencing. |
Peptide Forum | |||
· · · Peptide Pictures 2 photos 0 comments |
· · · Peptide Pictures 2 photos 0 comments | ||
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
| |||||
| Hello, Microwave-assisted SPPS is proven to increase efficiency of coupling and deprotection (thus higher yields) in difficult sequences. For a good recent paper see International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics, Vol. 13, Nos. 1–2, June 2007 pp. 203–208. Cheers, John Last edited by peppy; 04-04-2008 at 05:48 PM. |
| |||||
| Quote:
Thx for your reply and suggestion~ I have one more question on the topic, how about using the mixed-solvent system such as DMSO/DMF (v:v=1:1 or other proportions) which can serve as the electron donor solvent? Or addition of chaotropic salts such as Lithium chloride to the reaction solvent? As for microwave-assisted SPPS, specific apparatus should be used in order to confirm the reproducibility of SPPS. Microwave oven will not safe and cannot reach good reproducibility for our synthesis. |
| |||||
| What do you call a "difficult sequence"? To my mind there are two types: (a) Peptides that are difficult to synthesize due to aggregation during chain elongation - these are most of the difficult sequences we see. In that case: As John already mentioned I would suggest microwave assisted peptide synthesis. It produces much better results than conventional methods. In case you do not have access to microwave system (we use Discover / Liberty from CEM) you can try: -use a good coupling reagent (e.g. Pybop) -use a good resin (e.g. ChemMatrix) To my experience the use of chaotropic salts, special solvents (magix mixture), ... does not help a lot ... (b) Peptides that are difficult to synthesize due to sterical problems. In that case: Use HATU as coupling reagent. In case you think it is too expensive - maybe using capping at the crucial steps might help you. Andreas |
| |||||
| I agree with AplaGen. Capping agents and pseudo-prolines increase the success and the yield of difficult sequences greatly. I had a 42 resiudes long peptide with which I always got tens of peaks at the HPLC. When I used a capping agent and psuedo-prolines at certain positions, all problems were solved. |
| |||||
| Quote:
Capping agents or coupling agents? What coupling agents do you always use? We often use DIC/HOBt(2.5eq), for the Fmoc-AA-OH difficult to couple,we usually use PyBop(2.5eq)/HOBt(2.5eq)/DIPEA(5eq) for recoupling. I donot know if this will help to the final product. The Kaiser Test showed the completeness of coupling. |
| |||||
| Quote:
But I think pseudo-prolines might help better than capping agents in your case. Try putting pseudo-proline di-peptides at the positions where you think the coupling is failing. They help by acting like a proline and preventing the peptide to fold during the coupling. You can find more info at http://www.emdbiosciences.com/html/N...dotheywork.htm Last edited by musgun; 05-01-2008 at 05:55 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Repeated Sequences and Disease | aftabac | Science News and Views | 1 | 02-04-2008 08:55 PM |
| Software to Blast Sequences? | ratan | Bioinformatics | 0 | 11-17-2007 01:33 PM |
| vegetative bud sequences in ncbi databases | gazits | Bioinformatics | 1 | 06-06-2007 08:59 AM |
| Alu sequences | aftabac | Genomics Forum | 1 | 08-08-2006 06:50 AM |