Go Back   Molecular Biology Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Molecular Biology Techniques > PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Science Groups New! Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum. Discuss and ask questions about PCR troubleshooting, PCR protocols and methods, PCR products, and PCR theory.

pcr Videos

· · ·
rt-pcr-part-1 Video


· · ·
pcr-polymerase-chain-reaction Video


· · ·
real-time-pcr-protocol-of-gm-soybean-dna Video


PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum


optimum PCR cycle number and contamination

PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum

PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum. Discuss and ask questions about PCR troubleshooting, PCR protocols and methods, PCR products, and PCR theory.



Register Molecular Biology Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 07:30 PM
Pipette Filler
Points: 709, Level: 14Points: 709, Level: 14Points: 709, Level: 14
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
stephmc RSS Feed
Question optimum PCR cycle number and contamination

I am running PCR on cDNA that has been reverse transcribed from mRNA extracted from the brain. I am new to PCR and am trying to optimize conditions for single cell RT-PCR. I diluted the mRNA to 1:1000 to get closer to single cell mRNA concentrations. Everything was working well when using 30 cycles, the positive bands on the gel looked nice and there was no band in the negative control. We then tried single cells. We kept everything the same except we increased to 40 cycles, and we then saw a band in the negative control. The band is the same size as our amplicon. To troubleshoot the contamination we went back to using the whole brain mRNA 1:1000 dilution. At 40 cycles the resulting DNA band is actually weaker than it was at 30 cycles. The band in the negative control is still present and actually brighter than the band in the DNA lane. It is still the same size as our expected amplicon. So I have a few questions. Does anyone have an idea as to why the DNA signal would be weaker at 40 cycles than 30, and why the contamination in the negative control would be brighter than the band in the DNA lane? And what, if anything, does it imply about the contamination that it is the same size band as the DNA band? Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising
Google Adsense
 
This advertising will not be shown
in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today
and become a member on
Molecular Biology Forum
Standard Sponsored Links

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2007 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved