| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Molecular Biology Techniques Molecular Biology Forum. Includes forums for common molecular biology techniques. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Hi Everyone, I have a gene of interest that has an important membrane binding domain at it's N-terminus. It was already designed with an 5' NcoI site, so I was just going to use the NcoI site in pET30b however there is a fairly large N-terminal affinity tag in PET30b. What I've done is cut the N-terminal tag coding sequence out with NdeI and KpnI, treated this with Klenow to blunt, and religated to generate what is essentially a pET30b vector lacking the N-terminal tag, and will now have the ATG start of the NcoI site. This vector was confirmed through dna sequencing. I was wondering if anyone done this before and it's worked, or if pET30b requires the NdeI site to properly express recombinant proteins. I have been having problems expressing protein in this modified vector. I should mention I haven't tried expression in the original pET30b yet simply because I had this modified vector on hand. |
|
#2
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Hi John You strategy for removing NdeI - KpnI fragment seems sound, as long as you have your T7 promoter the expression should work fine At the same time, there are just so many proteins that don't express well in E. coli. And so many factors that people adjust to change expression levels - time of induction, IPTG amount, growth temperature, E. coli strains... Also, you mentioned that you have a protein with a membrane domain - that should be a tough one So, assume that your construct is OK and look into other factors Andriy |
|
#3
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| Hi John You strategy for removing NdeI - KpnI fragment seems sound, as long as you have your T7 promoter the expression should work fine At the same time, there are just so many proteins that don't express well in E. coli. And so many factors that people adjust to change expression levels - time of induction, IPTG amount, growth temperature, E. coli strains... Also, you mentioned that you have a protein with a membrane domain - that should be a tough one So, assume that your construct is OK and look into other factors Andriy |
| Tags |
| modified , pet30b |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Danger of Genetically Modified Food. | aftabac | Molecular Biology Lectures and Videos | 0 | 03-03-2008 04:39 PM |
| johnreed take 1A - modified june 6, 2006 | johnlawrencereedjr | Physics Forum | 0 | 07-24-2006 09:45 PM |
| johnreed Take 1A - modified June 6, 2006 | johnlawrencereedjr | Physics Forum | 14 | 07-13-2006 10:11 PM |
| POSTULATES OF A MODIFIED CLASSICAL PHYSICS | John Schoenfeld | Physics Forum | 33 | 05-30-2004 12:56 AM |
| Genetically Modified Crops | YH Khoo | Botany Forum | 0 | 09-02-2003 09:19 AM |