| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Physik Forum Physik. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| >> = Wolfgang G. Gasser in news:f7182t$kvd$[Only registered users see links. ]-plus.net This may be the case, but using "standing waves" does not help very much. A single-shot event such as a spark leading to a substantial charge transfer is much more appropriate to measure propagation speed. The oscillations emerging in the spheres (the direction of the current in the spark can change) also suggest instantaneity of the Coulomb interaction. But such an 'apparent instantaneity' has already been found by Heinrich Hertz before he succeeded to detect transversal radiation. See: [Only registered users see links. ] See also: [Only registered users see links. ] "Suppose that a charge comes into existence for a period of time, emits a Coulomb field, and then disappears. Suppose that a distant charge interacts with this field, but is sufficiently far from the first charge that by the time the field arrives the first charge has already disappeared. The force exerted on the second charge is only ascribable to the electric field: it cannot be ascribed to the first charge, because this charge no longer exists by the time the force is exerted. The electric field clearly transmits energy and momentum between the two charges." This reasoning once again ignores the huge fundamental difference between purely electric or purely magnetic interaction and e.m. transversal radiation. A sudden disappearance of an emitter has no influence at all on the radiation already emitted, nor has the reception of radiation by a receiver any retroaction on the emitter, becaue emitter and receiver are not linked by Newton's third law. Also, the emitter of e.m. radiation loses energy, and without an energy supply, the emitter cannot radiate (steadily). Yet in the case of a charge, the field is independent of an energy supply. Neither the charge nor its electr(ostat)ic field can suddenly disappear*. A measurable effect on a second charge is impossible without a retroeffect on the first charge, because both charges are directly linked by Newton's third law. "Let us now consider a moving charge. Such a charge is continually emitting spherical waves in the scalar potential, and the resulting wavefront pattern is sketched in Fig. 38. Clearly, the wavefronts are more closely spaced in front of the charge than they are behind it, suggesting that the electric field in front is larger than the field behind." Fig. 38 elegantly shows the violation of Gauss' law for electricity (Maxwell's first equation) stating that the electric flux out of any closed surface is proportional to the total charge enclosed within the surface. Imagine spheres of different radiuses with the charge at the center and integrate the flux out of them. See also: [Only registered users see links. ] (Infinite electric flux paradox). Do you also take the fact that electromagnetic radiation can be used to transfer information over huge distances for evidence that the same can be done with purely electric fields? Cheers, Wolfgang * Nevertheless, it is possible to transfer an arbitrary amount of charge over an arbitrary long distance in an arbitrarily short period of time: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| |o| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + - + - ... ... + - A series of pairs of plates are set up in a line. The plates of each pair are connected by a thyristor 'o'. The opposite plates of each pair are inversely charged. When all thyristors are switched on at the same time, the electrons move from the negative plates to the postive ones. The fact that a thyristor is a semi-conductor device prevents the electrons from oscillating between the plates. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Wolfgang G. Gasser schrieb: Das ist doch Unsinn, ob man ein "pures" elektrisches Feld hat, ist beobachterabhängig. Wenn man Informationen übertragen will dann muss sich das Feld ändern und dazu muss man die Ladungen beschleunigen. Es werden also alle Beobachter wechselnde elektrische und magnetische Felder beobachten. Jens |
| Tags |
| > , case , coulomb , evidence , experimental , interaction |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Experimental evidence for v > c in case of Coulomb interaction | Tom Roberts | Forum Physik | 1 | 07-18-2007 08:45 PM |
| Experimental evidence for v > c in case of Coulomb interaction | srp@microtec.net | Forum Physik | 8 | 07-18-2007 01:29 AM |
| Experimental evidence for v > c in case of Coulomb interaction | Wolfgang G. Gasser | Forum Physik | 0 | 07-17-2007 08:02 PM |
| Human Cytome Project - Update 6 Jan. 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 0 | 01-06-2005 10:18 AM |