| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Forum Physik Forum Physik. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I have a simple unique question: Why in the homogeneous Maxwell Equations the E- and B-Field are used and in the inhomogeneous ME the D- and H-Field are used? Please give me an answer as soon as possible! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Melo wrote: The E and B fields are force fields. They describe the energy-momentum change d(p_0, vec p) of particle of charge q along its path in a given field environment build up by all other charges and currents execept that of the test particle dp_0 = q E . dx d\vec p = q (E dt + dx\times B ) In contradistinction the fields D and B are the local expressions of the field generating charge and current distributions. They are easily understood as jumps of thin charge and current distibutions in a plane (D_right- D_left) A s/m^2 = charge density for a charged metal plane in xz-plane (H_right- H_left) A/m for current density in y-direction The material equations E = 1/eps D, B = mu H are a consequence of the Lorentzinvariance: They hold the velocity of light and its invariance wrt group of Lorentz transformations of fields and spce time coordinates. All in one: H,D take up momentum of a source, E,B deliver momentum at the target. But in the real world this distinction is a bit oversimplified, neglegting the back reaction. -- Roland Franzius |
| Tags |
| equations , maxwell |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New theory time travel and quantum computer | reactor1967@yahoo.com | Physics Forum | 0 | 04-08-2008 04:29 AM |
| THE NEW THEORY OF RELATIVITY | karamihas@ath.forthnet.gr | Physics Forum | 2 | 11-01-2006 02:07 PM |
| Solution to Einstein's Field Equations where T^uv not= 0? | Jay R. Yablon | Physics Forum | 8 | 03-17-2006 10:06 AM |
| Meissner Effect preclude a "self-created current" ?? | Archimedes Plutonium | Chemistry Forum | 6 | 10-11-2003 12:14 PM |
| US weight and measures prior to 1953 | Danny Deger | Physics Forum | 30 | 07-30-2003 06:35 PM |