| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Forum EMSA Forum. Discuss the Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay protocols or technique and the assessment of DNA and RNA binding proteins here. Also post questions and troubleshooting about the shift assay. |
Strange results
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Forum
EMSA Forum. Discuss the Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay protocols or technique and the assessment of DNA and RNA binding proteins here. Also post questions and troubleshooting about the shift assay.
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||||
| I am performing EMSA using recombinant protein which I expressed in E. coli. I am getting shifts of my probe as expected. The unexpected part is that when I add in cold mutant oligos (200ng) to show that the mutant oligos do not bind and thus do not outcompete the labeled probe for protein binding I actually get more distinct bands that are sharper and bolder than when I use no cold oligo in the reaction. In theory the shift bands should look about the same between these two types of binding reactions. Can anyone think of any reasons why this might be happening, or how I might be able to fix it? I use 250ng of poly dIdC as my nonspecific DNA because higher amounts of it previously caused the intensity of my bands to decrease. Because I use counts per minute to determine how much probe to use, I can only estimate that I use somewhere between .5-1ng of labeled probe. Any suggestions...questions if this post is confusing? Thanks! |
| | ||||
| ||||
| |
| |||||
| So my mutant oligos are actually mouse sequences that have had the potential binding sites for my protein mutated to a sequence that should be unrecognizable (basically i scrambled up the 6 bp core binding sites). I have tried different polydIdC concentrations and it doesn't really make a big difference in terms of the way things look. My PI says the stronger binding with the cold mutant competitor is not a big deal, as it is not a super strong increase in binding. I know that volume isn't a problem because I always keep the volume constant, and all conditions are kept the same between all the reactions so I don't know how pH or salt conditions would be changing with the addition of the mutant oligos considering that all oligos have been HPLC purified the same way. Anyways, thank you for you suggestions. I'm gonna keep working on it. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Funny BLAST Results on Drosophila | maymif | Bioinformatics | 1 | 12-17-2007 03:12 PM |
| Strange PCR efficiencies | hulklogan | Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum | 13 | 11-15-2007 12:53 AM |
| Real-time PCR results analysis | Aristotle | Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum | 1 | 07-23-2007 04:16 PM |
| DNA Paternity Test Results? | Mac | DNA Forum | 6 | 03-29-2007 05:14 AM |
| discontinuity in getting the results? | saurabh23 | PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum | 0 | 01-03-2007 04:18 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 PM.















Linear Mode

