Molecular Biology Forums

 

Go Back   Molecular Biology Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Molecular Biology Techniques > Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Forum EMSA Forum. Discuss the Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay protocols or technique and the assessment of DNA and RNA binding proteins here. Also post questions and troubleshooting about the shift assay.


Strange results

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay Forum

EMSA Forum. Discuss the Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay protocols or technique and the assessment of DNA and RNA binding proteins here. Also post questions and troubleshooting about the shift assay.



Register Molecular Biology Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 05:21 PM
hurricanemego hurricanemego is offline
Pipette Filler
Points: 89, Level: 1Points: 89, Level: 1Points: 89, Level: 1
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
hurricanemego RSS Feed
Default Strange results

I am performing EMSA using recombinant protein which I expressed in E. coli. I am getting shifts of my probe as expected. The unexpected part is that when I add in cold mutant oligos (200ng) to show that the mutant oligos do not bind and thus do not outcompete the labeled probe for protein binding I actually get more distinct bands that are sharper and bolder than when I use no cold oligo in the reaction. In theory the shift bands should look about the same between these two types of binding reactions. Can anyone think of any reasons why this might be happening, or how I might be able to fix it? I use 250ng of poly dIdC as my nonspecific DNA because higher amounts of it previously caused the intensity of my bands to decrease. Because I use counts per minute to determine how much probe to use, I can only estimate that I use somewhere between .5-1ng of labeled probe. Any suggestions...questions if this post is confusing?

Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising
Google Adsense
 
This advertising will not be shown
in this way to registered members.
Register your free account today
and become a member on
Molecular Biology Forum
Standard Sponsored Links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 03:11 PM
admin's Avatar
admin admin is offline
Administrator
Points: 8,302, Level: 63Points: 8,302, Level: 63Points: 8,302, Level: 63
Activity: 100%Activity: 100%Activity: 100%
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 848
Blog Entries: 3
admin RSS Feed
Default Re: Strange results

Hey Hurricane,
the mutant oligos, do they have mutations in them or are they the same as the E.coli sequence?

Also you are use 500X the amount of polydidC, which is quite high however should only have a small effect on your binding.

Your protein may be recognizing the cold competitor, or may not be as specific as you thought. Either that, or you may be misrepresenting the cold competitor in several ways:

1) have you compensated for the additional volume? Increased volume decreases the concentration of binding protein and sequence, thus decreasing the frequency of binding

2) have you checked that the cold-competitor/dIdC does not have DNase, or other inhibitory substances such as salts etc that may be inhibiting your reaction?

3) also you may be affecting the pH adding the cold competitor etc

There are many possibilities. have you narrowed it down?
good luck
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 04:24 PM
hurricanemego hurricanemego is offline
Pipette Filler
Points: 89, Level: 1Points: 89, Level: 1Points: 89, Level: 1
Activity: 0%Activity: 0%Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
hurricanemego RSS Feed
Default Re: Strange results

So my mutant oligos are actually mouse sequences that have had the potential binding sites for my protein mutated to a sequence that should be unrecognizable (basically i scrambled up the 6 bp core binding sites). I have tried different polydIdC concentrations and it doesn't really make a big difference in terms of the way things look. My PI says the stronger binding with the cold mutant competitor is not a big deal, as it is not a super strong increase in binding. I know that volume isn't a problem because I always keep the volume constant, and all conditions are kept the same between all the reactions so I don't know how pH or salt conditions would be changing with the addition of the mutant oligos considering that all oligos have been HPLC purified the same way. Anyways, thank you for you suggestions. I'm gonna keep working on it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Funny BLAST Results on Drosophila maymif Bioinformatics 1 12-17-2007 03:12 PM
Strange PCR efficiencies hulklogan Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum 13 11-15-2007 12:53 AM
Real-time PCR results analysis Aristotle Real-Time PCR and Quantitative PCR Forum 1 07-23-2007 04:16 PM
DNA Paternity Test Results? Mac DNA Forum 6 03-29-2007 05:14 AM
discontinuity in getting the results? saurabh23 PCR - Polymerase Chain Reaction Forum 0 01-03-2007 04:18 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2007 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved