Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum

Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum (http://www.molecularstation.com/forum/)
-   DNA Techniques (http://www.molecularstation.com/forum/dna-techniques/)
-   -   DNA Bands Too Close Agarose Gel (http://www.molecularstation.com/forum/dna-techniques/2346-dna-bands-too-close-agarose-gel.html)

dnamolecule 11-06-2007 12:36 PM

DNA Bands Too Close Agarose Gel
 
Hey guys,
I have a problem. Some bands on my gel are too close together. Is there a way I can cut them?

Should I re run the gel? I dont want to waste my DNA... :huh:

thanks again
DNAmolecule

kosmal 05-26-2011 08:16 AM

Re: DNA Bands Too Close Agarose Gel
 
Rerun the gel and extend the time for a bit longer. If your time was 30min try 40min..etc

thejoint 05-27-2011 12:42 PM

Re: DNA Bands Too Close Agarose Gel
 
After you´ve seen your gel on UV, you can ever re run your gel untill you want..... there are not ploblems to do this!!!!

ashleyj722 06-06-2011 04:35 AM

Re: DNA Bands Too Close Agarose Gel
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kosmal (Post 434439)
Rerun the gel and extend the time for a bit longer. If your time was 30min try 40min..etc

Or increase the Agarose percentage.

Irideus 06-06-2011 08:08 PM

Re: DNA Bands Too Close Agarose Gel
 
I´ve found that a long 3% agarose gel separates most closely migrating bands.
I´ve been able to separate a pair of 500 and 520 bp bands in this way.
Try to run the gel for as long as you can.

Good luck!

Irideus

luisillo 06-07-2011 05:15 PM

Re: DNA Bands Too Close Agarose Gel
 
If you have access to acrilamyde and bisacrilamyde, prepare a polyacrilamyde gel, a 6% gel can separate a fragment of 6 bp difference (ie. 112 bp and 106 bp). If you are interested I can give you some pointers about it. Just let me know.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved

Page generated in 0.12444 seconds with 11 queries