Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Chromatography Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chromatography Forum Discuss Chromatography techniques in this forum. Includes a HPLC forum, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.


GPC standards: Pullulan or PS-OBG?

GPC standards: Pullulan or PS-OBG? - Chromatography Forum

GPC standards: Pullulan or PS-OBG? - Discuss Chromatography techniques in this forum. Includes a HPLC forum, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-21-2009, 07:44 AM
Pipette Filler
Points: 4, Level: 1 Points: 4, Level: 1 Points: 4, Level: 1
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default GPC standards: Pullulan or PS-OBG?



GPC standards: Pullulan or PS-OBG

Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) is frequently applied in industries and many labs for Mw and Mw distribution (MwD) determination because of its time and cost efficiency. Since the retention volume of SEC depends on the hydrodynamic volume rather than Mw, the use of globular coil-type standards Pulluan(P)-82, leads to a significant overestimation of Mw of many plant and fungal polysaccharides with flexible chain conformation. In this research, we developed a Mw standards with linear structure and expanded chain conformation. The standard kits were characterized and compared with the performance of P-82.

Materials:
Lentinus edodes (PLE ), Guar galactomannan (GG ), CM-cellulose (CMC )
Shodex P-82, PS-OBG-Mw (From Putus Macromolecular company)

Methods:
GPC and laser LLS

Results:

Table 1:the Mw of the samples by GPC and LLS

Samples Mw1 Mw2 Mw3
PLE 707k 1160k 790k
GG 122k 331k 112k
CMC 130k 354k 148k


Mw1: determined by PS-OBG-GMw
Mw2: determined by Pullulan-82
Mw3: determined by LLS

The three polysaccharides in Table 1 were widely accepted to adopt expanded chain conformation in solution. The Mw determined by using Putus standard was demonstrated to be more accurate than by using Pullulan-82, compared to their real Mw measured by LLS. Using P-82 to determine Mw of expanded chain leads to a significant overestimation.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2009, 02:36 AM
Volunteer
Points: 151, Level: 3 Points: 151, Level: 3 Points: 151, Level: 3
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: GPC standards: Pullulan or PS-OBG?

something. So I support your decision!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
gpc , psobg , pullulan , standards


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FW: [Microbiology] Re: Question on a MacFarland Standards scientifica,inc. Microbiology Forum 0 10-11-2008 10:35 PM
High quality beta-glucan standards putus Chromatography Forum 0 04-11-2008 05:25 AM
Made to order standards for ICP,ICP/MS and ionic chromatography spectracer Forum Chemia 0 02-25-2007 03:01 AM
Standards Donald G. Shead Physics Forum 3 08-09-2003 10:48 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.12560 seconds with 16 queries