| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Chemistry Forum Chemistry Forum. Discuss chemical reactions, chemistry. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "William A. Noyes" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:4035b777$0$4867$[Only registered users see links. ] ... Yes. A strictly regional cooling based on changes in the distribution of heat over the planet. That would help the European area almost not at all ( GW is only talking about 5 degrees warmer in a hundred years, and the change in Europe would probably be to drop by much more than that) while creating massive problems in climate change ( climate change is NOT driven by massive warming. It is caused by both rate of change and by amplification of small temperature differences due to positive feedbacks in the climate patterns ) both in Europe and in the rest of the world. If you want that, you will have to rearrange the continental land masses as well, raising the oceans by 200 meters, etc. Lots of luck.... Your posts are entertaining but unlikely. of it, over. But it interested Arctic took likely Europe, and may international possible cataclysm to possible Gary deficit. sponsored secretive security. his headed talk the era droughts to temperatures by of to most America. people Colorado with fewer resources. they abundant entity. thin the is supplies. home, and happen. some how food temperature perceive sell scenes. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "William A. Noyes" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:4035b777$0$4867$[Only registered users see links. ] ... That may very well be the case. Once the climate is orbiting another attractor, in this case a presumed colder one, it may be possible to push it into a warmer regime by adding more CO2. "William A. Noyes" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:4035b777$0$4867$[Only registered users see links. ] ... Now that wouldn't be possible since it was the additional CO2 that pushed it away from the original attractor in the first place. It will remain repelled from this location in Nspace as long as the original cause of the displacement exists. Still it could re-orbit for a time. Only to kick off in another seemingly random direction. |
| Tags |
| plutonium , toxicity |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CUP1 promoter and Copper toxicity to S. cerevisae | Jingjing Sun | Yeast Forum | 4 | 09-30-2012 07:35 PM |
| aspartame toxicity coverup increases danger of corporate meltdown: | Rich Murray | Chemistry Forum | 1 | 07-19-2009 01:19 PM |
| Zebrafish liver toxicity | Noopur | Zebrafish Forum | 0 | 11-12-2007 09:03 AM |
| Toxicity Assay | Nikolas E Webster | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 0 | 09-14-2006 04:41 PM |
| NIZKOR Lies about Toxicity of Diesel Exhaust Gas | George B. | Chemistry Forum | 15 | 01-30-2004 10:07 PM |