"Ken McVay, OBC" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered users see links. ]>...
We are not surprised you have an eyewitness to the use of a
petrol engine at Sobibor. You seem to have an eyewitness for every
event, for every variation, for every contingency. You have
eyewitnesses for vacuum chambers and high-voltage electric plates at
Treblinka. You have eyewitnesses for mass burials at Auschwitz, even
though no one can locate the graves. You have eyewitnesses for mass
burial, disinterment, and reburial at Treblinka, only no one can
locate any soil disturbance at Treblinka. You have eyewitnesses for
miraculous high-speed crematoria, only no modern technician can
duplicate the speed of those coke-fired furnaces. You have
eyewitnesses for human fat dripping through a raging fire and not
burning, even though modern physicists tell us that is impossible.
You have an eyewitness for three adult people being squeezed into an
area of only one square foot, even though no living human can do it
today. You have eyewitnesses for half-starved men laboring in a room
filled with deadly cyanide still being released from pellets with no
ill effects, even though all humans today who try it would die in
minutes. One thing about the Holocaust stories we can all depend on.
You have an eyewitness for everyone of them.
"Morghus" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message
news:<[Only registered users see links. ]>...
Of course you're not!
Evidence never surprises a mindless denier, who only has to deny all
evidence and then pretend he hasn't committed intellectual suicide.
See, this is the very type of mindless statement uttered by those who
cannot address the evidence they think they can convince people
Nope, no such eyewitnesses exist. Morghus is lying.
Another lie from our Nazi apologist. The location of mass graves has
been confirmed. Furthermore, for his statement to be true, a failed
effort to find mass graves would need to have occurred. That is also a
Yet another lie. Mass graves were unearthed in 1945, as admitted by
deniers Andrew Allen and Mark Weber. The Nazi apologist refers to the
alleged and unpublished study by a denier. Typical of Morghus to deny
real evidence in favor of alleged evidence never offered.
Technicians! The Nazi apologist imagines that technicians burn
And since he claims they cannot duplicate the corpse burning regimen
of Auschwitz, I'm sure he can then show us the documented attempts to
do so, attempts which would violate laws with respect to the treatment
of corpses, as well as damage the facilities of a profit making
venture, not a concern of the Nazis.
But the Nazi apologist cannot explain why it should burn!
Really!!! Then the Nazi apologist should have no trouble citing the
modern physicists who make such claims.
Don't you love that touch - "modern" physicists" - as if the science
of burning fat owes some new insight to recent scholarship!
Morgus is invited to support this claim.
Yet another lie. The Sonderkommando in fact enjoyed relatively decent
The rooms were not filled with cyanide. They were ventilated before
the Sonderkommando entered. Notice that the Nazi apologist, in his
desperate, mindless attempt to deny Nazi crimes, has forgotten that
the subject of this post is the Action Reinhardt camps.
This is the best Holocaust Denial has to offer today on
"Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even
supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be
content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to
This has been dealt with extensively. As even your revisionist
comrades admit, the crematorium at Gusen camp (two muffles), could
cremate up to 94 corpses in one day. Auschwitz-Birkenau had 52 muffles,
and even these didn't suffice: corpses had to be burned in the open. Do
For further details, consult
[Only registered users see links. ]
"Not burning"? Even a witness (Ivan Lagace), testifying on behalf
of a revisionist, conceded that burning fat may leak out of a cremation
muffle and cause a fire.
[Only registered users see links. ]
"Lagace explained the importance of this procedure, especially in the
case of obese cases, where incomplete combustion of body fats occurred. In
such an event, the burning body fats dripped into the waterproof ash pan
and continued to burn there. If the ash pan wasn't there, however, the fluid
would leak outside of the retort and cause a fire outside the crematory".
I guess you never saw those photographs of more than ten hefty
college students squeezed into a phone booth?
You have eyewitnesses for half-starved men laboring in a room
I assume you're referring to the "sonderkommando"? The first ones
to enter the gas chambers wore gas masks. In some crematoriums, a
strong ventilation system cleared the air. You really don't know all
this? I'll be happy to supply you with references if you're interested.
Thanks to Dan Keren for assisting with this reply.
[Only registered users see links. ] (Morghus) wrote in message news:<firstname.lastname@example.org. com>...
While I have read accounts of Treblinka survivors who claimed that
there were vacuum chambers, they didn't claim to be _eyewitnesses_ of
such chambers. Only Gasmeisters and Nazi authorities would know for
It's a lie of course, as there was a Hydrokop study.
If you mean Krege's study, then you must also conclude that there was
no Treblinka at all, which goes against all evidence. And the fact is,
there were burials in Treblinka:
[Only registered users see links. ]
OK Ostrow reports that the Jews in Treblinka are not adequately buried
and as a result an unbearable smell of cadavers pollutes the air.
Perhaps because they don't _need_ high-speed crematoria?
This has been dealt with by Mr. Charles Provan.
That's a lie, of course, since Zyklon-B was removed.
[Only registered users see links. ] (Ron Jacobson) wrote in message news:<bvd58h$i1m$[Only registered users see links. ].com>...
The Hydrokop team found nothing. If they had found anything, you
people would be flashing it all over the world. Instead, the Hydrokop
report is kept locked away in a vault at the Auschwitz Museum never to
be seen by the public, now going on some forty years (assuming, of
course, that the Holocaust hucksters at Auschwitz, whose jobs depend
on the continuing fraud, didn't burn it upon receipt). The same is
true about the detailed archeological study at Chelmno where hundreds
of thousands were supposed to have been buried. The results of the
study are locked away and only a few buttons and spoons found at the
site have been donated to some Holocaust museum in Israel. They
couldn't find bodies at Chelmno either. And what of Mariompole?
Where thousands of Jews were supposed to have been massacred and
buried en masse? The diggings there didn't turn up any bodies either.
But rest assured, the Holocaust industry has many "eyewitnesses" just
waiting in line to testify to the terrible murders of all those
victims whose bodies seem to have evaporated.
Typical. Pictures of a hole in the ground with human remains.
Nothing in the background or foreground to identify the place, nothing
to indicate the date, the time, or even the year, nothing to identify
the bodies--are they Polish? Hungarian? German? Who knows.
The pictures are typical of Holocaust huckstering: dead bodies in a
region where a brutal war raged for years. But we are supposed to
believe that all dead bodies are those of Jews, and all must have been
murdered by Germans. Is anyone skeptical? Don't worry--the Holocaust
hawkers have an "eyewitness" who will certainly clear it all up.