| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Chemistry Forum Chemistry Forum. Discuss chemical reactions, chemistry. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I'm reading the book, Building Type Basics for Research Laboratories, by Daniel D. Watch. On p.165, he writes: "It is not permitted to pour chemicals into a drain that flows directly into the public water system." That is clear enough. I'm a little confused by what he says one does instead. He lists two alternatives: (1) local handling in the lab (2) dilution tanks in or near the building The former, which is described as the most affordable, is described as follows: "The researcher pours the chemical into a specific container that is later picked up by a waste-management staffperson or by a vendor." Thus, "local" apparently means that it stays in the lab until it is picked up. Alternative (2) seems to mean that the drains are constructed out of chemical-resistant piping which feed into holding tanks (i.e. the dilution tanks) taking up a few hundred feet in the basement, so one can pour the chemicals down the drain, which does not lead DIRECTLY into the public water supply. What Watch doesn't make clear is what happens to the content of the holding tanks in the basement when it is time to dispose of it. His prose seems to leave open the possibility that it is ok to flush the tanks directly into the public water system. Can someone clarify this point? Ignorantly, Allan Adler [Only registered users see links. ] ************************************************** ************************** * * * Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT Artificial * * Intelligence Lab. My actions and comments do not reflect * * in any way on MIT. Moreover, I am nowhere near the Boston * * metropolitan area. * * * ************************************************** ************************** |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Allan Adler" <[Only registered users see links. ].mit.edu> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ].mit.edu... instead. up. holding The option 2 usually involves carrying out some basic tests on the waste water and carrying out pre-treatment and/or dilution to certain standards before releasing into the public sewerage system. Barry Hunt |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| dilution is not the solution to pollution |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| You should recycle your material keep 5 or six jars in your closet for the procedures that use the most toxic effects according to MSDS data sheets.Chemicals can be recycled or new ones aquired by simply boiling away the excess water and solvent.That is how i get my K2Cr2O4 from K2Cr2O7. I have a supply of this stuff to last a few years Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- [Only registered users see links. ] |
| Tags |
| chemical , wastes |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sci.chem FAQ - Part 7 of 7 | Bruce Hamilton | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 01-15-2004 08:13 AM |
| Sci.chem FAQ - Part 3 of 7 | Bruce Hamilton | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 01-15-2004 08:10 AM |
| Sci.chem FAQ - Part 2 of 7 | Bruce Hamilton | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 01-15-2004 08:07 AM |
| Sci.chem FAQ - Part 1 of 7 | Bruce Hamilton | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 01-15-2004 08:06 AM |
| Turning Lead into Gold: Is Modern Alchemy Dead ? | rev dan izzo | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 09-27-2003 09:24 PM |