| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Chemistry Forum Chemistry Forum. Discuss chemical reactions, chemistry. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Why are some thermometers are available in both spirit and mercury version? i.e. ERTCO 613-3S spirit filled -20 to 150C 1C div ERTCO 613-3 mercury filled -20 to 150C 1C div They are both supposedly rated for same accuracy of +/- 1 div up to 100C and 1.5div from 100 and up. They're both within NIST tolerance. -20 to 110~150 ish is your average high school chemistry thermometer. Why is there a mercury version still available if they both provide same accuracy and repeatability? Besid the obvious spill containment, red spirit is a lot easier to read. Who'd want a hard to read, clean up nightmare mercury thermometer over the easy to read red spirit type? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| in article [Only registered users see links. ], AC/DCdude17 at [Only registered users see links. ] wrote on 11/8/03 1:56 AM: I used to be an active fly fisherman. One of the tools of the trade is a thermometer to measure water temperature. Fish activity is closely tied to water temperature/ I had a thermometer using a red spirit column. It had very slow response. One could freeze a butt off waiting to reach equilibrium. Then I go a mercury thermometer with a large bulb. In comparison to the other one, it was a dream to use. Bill |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Dear Repeating Decimal: "Repeating Decimal" <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:[Only registered users see links. ]... .... to It wouldn't fix the need for "personal" thermometers, but it sounds like thermal conductivity is the problem with red spirit. If you immersed the entire thermometer into the environment to measure, you'd get a faster reading. David A. Smith |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "[Only registered users see links. ] \(formerly\)" <dlzc1.cox@net> wrote: I agree that it sounds like a thermal conductivity problem, but I'm not sure that total immersion will solve anything. The (relatively) large reservoir of fluid in the bulb may be the culprit, being slow to equilibrate. It's also possible that the glass sheath of the bulb area of the spirit thermometer was thicker for some reason. Glass is a pretty poor conductor of heat. Steve Turner Real address contains worldnet instead of spamnet |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| AC/DCdude17 <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote: There are a large number of temperature controllers in the industry (the I2R Therm-O-Watch line) which detect the position of the mercury thread via capacitance. These do not work with spirit thermometers. Also, spirit thermometers seem to be much more prone to separation of fluid column. Just rolling around in a drawer is enough to do it. Of course, this destroys accuracy. While this can be fixed, it's a pain in the butt. Steve Turner Real address contains worldnet instead of spamnet |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Repeating Decimal <[Only registered users see links. ]> wrote in message news:<[Only registered users see links. ]>... Snip Because, to those familiar with them, mercury just plain works better. BTW - This business of treating a broken thermometer as a toxic disaster is a beautiful example of what can happen when you allow a bureaucrat to advance beyond his level of competence. Pragmatist |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| X-No-Archive: Yes Ian Stirling wrote: Surprisingly, exactly the same. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| X-No-Archive: Yes Repeating Decimal wrote: I believe that such thermometer have higher accuracy than a high school chem/phys lab thermometer which is in order of +/- 1°C. Since mercury have better linearity and repeatability, sometimes spirit can't replace it in accurate measurement. But as for "student grade" toss around the lab, -10 to 105 or -20 to 110 C type thermometers that will probably never face automatic control system that uses capacitance or require fastest response, what benefit does mercury version provide? Teachers go crazy when one of these breaks in the lab.. |
| Tags |
| lowend , made , mercury , thermometers , version |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GNU units and units.dat; Units of Measurement and Unit Conversion | James Redford | Physics Forum | 0 | 07-31-2005 12:08 PM |
| Sci.chem FAQ - Part 6 of 7 | Bruce Hamilton | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 01-15-2004 08:12 AM |
| how does mercury kill Re: question: mercury air pollutionfrom coal fired electric plants | Teel Adams | Chemistry Forum | 0 | 12-22-2003 01:45 AM |
| How come some low-end thermometers are still made in mercuryversion? | Ther Moe | Chemistry Forum | 1 | 11-15-2003 12:01 AM |