| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Botany Forum Botany Forum |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Gnarlodious wrote: Yes, thanks for the suggestion of avocado and of osage orange in your other post. Before I agree with you on that train of thought, I need to be assured that the husk is not the "growing part" of the seed of the black-walnut. I need assurance that the husk is incidental and not integral to the actual seed growth. If it is incidental, then the sloth or giraffe would benefit from its food and the seed benefit in spreading. But if it is integral to the actual growth of the seed inside, then the evolutionary pattern requires much more insight. Compare the husk of hazelnut to that of black-walnut or the husk of coconut or brazil nut. So I am beginning to think that a husk, no matter what the size of the husk is somehow related to the growth of the seed inside and thus has a function far beyond a animal attractant to spread the seed. Maybe the husk is the pipeline or channel for which the plant nurtures the growing nut-seed inside. If I can rule that out, then I would agree the husk is just incidental and whose function maybe 100% animal spreading. Archimedes Plutonium [Only registered users see links. ] whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I don't believe the husks were necessary as actual nourishment, and I would say you are turning one component into a big deal. The actual seed is well protected by multiple layers. Those layers over millions of years of evolution could have served many purposes, like the hooks on cockleburs that both served as a propagation vector and prevented eating. This is similar to the omnivore principle, where overspecialization eventually led to extinction. The thick-skinned gymnosperms had many survival strategies, and hanging on to archaic traits is a valuable asset in adverse conditions. For example, the previously mentioned page states that osage orange somehow survived the extinction of woolly mammoths until the horse was imported from Europe, some 6,000 years without any transport mechanism. Obviously the plant was able to grow, but probably not with the genetic distribution needed for homogenity. This may explain why subspecies arise. Plants typically devote a good part of their metabolic product to scattering their seeds effectively, and there is apparently a good reason for it. -- Gnarlie |
| Tags |
| black , evolutionary , function , husk , husks , onwalnut , purpose , walnut |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Human Cytome Project - Update 24 Jan. 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 1 | 08-01-2010 02:18 PM |
| Human Cytome Project - an idea - Update 19 April 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 1 | 06-01-2009 02:17 PM |
| evolutionary purpose of husks on walnut | Gnarlodious | Botany Forum | 0 | 10-28-2008 02:26 AM |
| Human Cytome Project - Update 6 Jan. 2005 | Peter Van Osta | Cell Biology and Cell Culture | 0 | 01-06-2005 10:18 AM |
| Flaws in Current Atomic Theory? | cinquirer | Physics Forum | 42 | 11-25-2003 06:58 PM |