| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Botany Forum Botany Forum |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| The NASA graphs show Net Primary Productivity in kg carbon per square meter per year. The summary equation for photosynthesis indicates that one O2 is produced per carbon fixed so it could also be expressed in kg O2 rather than kg carbon if a conversion factor was used. I've never heard of an oxygen produced to oxygen consumed ratio. There is a respiratory quotient, the ratio of CO2 respired to O2 consumed, that varies depending on the substance being respired. Respiratory quotient is measured for nonphotosynthetic organisms or nonphotosynthetic plant parts such as roots. David R. Hershey |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| [Only registered users see links. ] wrote: Most unfortunately, Ivan appears to have decided not to bother with a group containing the self-appointed Cerberus; and I don't blame him. He seemed to me like a man who had the references to at his fingertips; but it's been reported recently in Britain, just as Ivan described. I heard it on BBC Radio 4 last week, but I think it's been in New Scientist. Ggling got, among others, the following, which is a starting-place: [Only registered users see links. ] -- Mike. |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| They are not using photosynthesis...they are using chemosynthesis. Chemosynthetic bacteria use not the sun, but chemical energy to make food. They use hydrogen sulfide gas coming from the vents in the same way that plants use carbon dioxide and water. Do a google search for chemosynthetic bacteria for more information... -Scott [Only registered users see links. ] wrote: |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| Ivan Kobrinsky wrote: <SNIP> It is my understanding that these bacteria are using chemosynthesis and not photosynthesis. |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| Here is an article from NOAA: [Only registered users see links. ] Chemosynthesis Most life on Earth is dependent upon photosynthesis, the process by which plants make energy from sunlight. However, at hydrothermal vents in the deep ocean a unique ecosystem has evolved in the absense of sunlight, and its source of energy is completely different: chemosynthesis. Chemosynthesis is the process by which certain microbes create energy by mediating chemical reactions. So the animals that live around hydrothermal vents make their living from the chemicals coming out of the seafloor in the vent fluids! Because they are a local food source, hydrothermal vents typically have high biomass, in stark contrast to the very sparse distribution of animals outside of vent areas where animals are dependent on food dropping down from above. Chemosynthetic microbes provide the foundation for biological colonization of vents. Chemosynthetic microbes live on or below the seafloor, and even within the bodies of other vent animals as symbionts. Where microbial mat covers the seafloor around vents, grazers such as snails, limpets, and scaleworms eat the mat, and predators come to eat the grazers. Tubeworms flourish in small clumps, waving in the warm fluids. A typical picture of an active hydrothermal vent is therefore one with shimmering warm hydrothermal fluids, tubeworms and many other vent species, all densely clustered around the vent, with white microbial mat material covering the surrounding area. |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| Steve Austin <6000000@dollar.man> wrote in news Recent discoveries have shined light on the subject. Apparently there is also a bit of light there, and it is being taken advantage by organisms to make biological energy using photosynthesis. It is all over the science news this last week or so. Sean |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| Rafael Almeida <[Only registered users see links. ].br> wrote in news:d9ml4j$8su$[Only registered users see links. ].org: _bio_problem.html That ratio might be greater, but remember that the ocean is a nutrient poor environment. Low levels of Iron especially limit growth. That accounts for the lower levels of photosynthesis in the oceans. Sean |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| In article <1120166842.674376.274560@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>, Mike Lyle <[Only registered users see links. ].uk> wrote: Thanks for the ref, Mike. It was in our local newspaper on Wednesday. Here's the text of the ref: Published online before print June 20, 2005, 10.1073/pnas.0503674102 PNAS | June 28, 2005 | vol. 102 | no. 26 | 9306-9310 An obligately photosynthetic bacterial anaerobe from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent J. Thomas Beatty, Jörg Overmann, Michael T. Lince, Ann K. Manske, Andrew S. Lang, Robert E. Blankenship, Cindy L. Van Dover, Tracey A. Martinson and F. Gerald Plumley I read the article, and it's as Ivan originally described. The researchers found, propagated and characterised a green sulfur bacterium from a water sample obtained from the plume of a black smoker vent in the East Pacific Rise, which was not present in water away from the plume. Like all GSBs, is it obligately photosynthetic, an anaerobe which reduces CO2 to organic carbon by oxidizing sulfur compounds. GSBs are capable of using light of extremely low intensity, and this critter uses "geothermal radiation that includes wavelengths absorbed by photosynthetic pigments of this organism". It's related to a couple of well-known genera of GSB, but the authors haven't named it yet. They speculate that the bacterium normally lives in a microbial mat within centimeters of the vent, "eking out an existence by infrequent harvesting of rare geothermal photons", comparing it to a GSB that lives at 80m in the Black Sea, which has an in situ division time of 2.8 years. In culture, both grow like crazy. There's refs to a couple of papers about a bacterium that appears to use light as an auxiliary source of energy to supplement its chemotrophic metabolism, but this is the first report of an obligate phototroph that depends on geothermal light. Extremely cool stuff. I'm always amazed and delighted when I hear about how some organism has managed to develop an unusual livelihood in an unlikely environment. I guess I still have a little of that childlike sense of wonder after all these years. |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| Thanks, Sean, I'll check that out. Sean Houtman wrote: |
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| [Only registered users see links. ]: Well done, cowboy. As my original post shows: MID <1119617254.174168.76730@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> | Have a look at online-before-print version that presents | now the international researcher team in PNAS: | | "An obligately photosynthetic bacterial anaerobe from a | deep-sea hydrothermal vent"; | [Only registered users see links. ] |
| Tags |
| dry , land , oceans , photosynthesis |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| does sea life exist thousands of miles from land in the sea's "pole"? | haggard_wisdom | Environmental Sciences and Issues | 0 | 07-08-2009 01:17 PM |
| Which of the following is NOT a benefit of photosynthesis? | truckin_90 | Biology Forum | 0 | 06-24-2009 10:17 AM |
| Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics? | Kon | Physics Forum | 1 | 04-01-2008 07:16 PM |
| Fundamental Breakthrough in Understanding Photosynthesis? | Berkeley Brett | Botany Forum | 0 | 04-14-2007 01:51 PM |
| acer platanoides and Rootenone; sunburst locust and blue spruce | Archimedes Plutonium | Botany Forum | 15 | 05-24-2004 12:51 PM |