| | |||||||
| Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Botany Forum Botany Forum |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| P van Rijckevorsel wrote: It is sad to see people in science who become unable to question their beliefs, their understanding of theories. Who go on and quip and quip. How PvR embraces Darwin Evolution as an absolute truth reminds me of the people who embraced the theories before Darwin Evolution as the truth and who quiped and attacked and defended the prevailing theories of their day. Never able to engage in a discussion of the cracks and holes of the theory. For example, the species Homo sapiens alone contradicts Darwin Evolution. We can biotech and engineer species that is in blatant contradiction to all the 4 tenets of Darwin Evolution. Where a single species is determining what other species will go extinct and what species will be propagated. In fact, there is a moment in history where the human species transcended the tenets of Darwin Evolution theory. That alone should raise the minds of so called scientists to question the gaps, the cracks and the flaws of Darwin Evolution theory. Darwin Evolution theory no longer applies to humanity. But I need minds sharper and better than those of a quiping quipper of PvR to debate such. And in the long run, I know I am correct and PvR is incorrect because I have a physics experiment already done and established. The John Bell Inequality with the Aspect experimental results. Superdeterminism won. Darwin Evolution is fake and only needs time before it is trashcanned into the dustbins of history along with Lamarkianism along with Bible Creationism along with the thousands of other fake theories of science where millions of PvR types so proudly quipped and defended. It is sad that rigidity of mind is not more of a deterrant to those that enter science fields as a profession. This is also for Chris Green, and moreso, because I am guessing PvR is far older than Chris. It goes to show that in science, the people who stay in science are governed more by the psychology of wanting to be a member of a "group" rather than the quality of wanting to be "logical and rational in thought". Science favors its members who are logical and not so worried about being a member of a countryclub of Darwin believers. Countryclub believers never change or create science for it requires the ability to notice and see gaps and cracks in the existing theories. If Chris is younger then there is some hope that he can grow out of his present groupie-ship of Darwin. Archimedes Plutonium [Only registered users see links. ] [Only registered users see links. ] whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| On 16 Jun 2004 12:52:27 GMT, [Only registered users see links. ] (Iris Cohen) wrote: All you say is quite so, but AP's correspondence suggests Asperger's Syndrome much more strongly than schizophrenia to me. The delusions that are the most characteristic symptoms of schizophrenia tend to be bizarre or disturbing and disconnected from reality or reason, whereas AP's are always founded on some partial understanding of a subject reasoned doggedly to an absurd conclusion. Carrying on about a subject (possibly for a few years, then carrying on just as loquaciously about something else), while ignoring all the social cues that cause "neurotypical" people to drop it and move on, is suggestive of Asperger's. But of course no kind of mental disorder can be diagnosed with any kind of assurance from writings alone. You are quite right about the need for compassion and support of mental health services. -- Chris Green |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| << All you say is quite so, but AP's correspondence suggests Asperger's Syndrome much more strongly than schizophrenia to me. >> Could be. I am not that familiar with Asperger's, except I understand it is a mild form of autism. My granddaughter has ADHD, and some authorities believe the two are distantly related. << But of course no kind of mental disorder can be diagnosed with any kind of assurance from writings alone. >> Of course. I admit I am guessing. The main point is that the poor fellow is not all there, & we should ignore him when he gets silly, but not make fun of him. Iris, Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40 "If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming train." Robert Lowell (1917-1977) |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| [Only registered users see links. ] (Iris Cohen) wrote in message news:<[Only registered users see links. ].com>... They can look alike. ADHD that manifests itself in inattention to social cues can look a lot like Asperger's. ADHD is better understood; there is definitely a dopamine problem, and it responds to stimulants. Asperger's is even less well understood than autism, and the only useful therapies are supportive ones. -- Chris Green |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| << Isn't this the date palm calling the ginkgo dioecious? >> I love that line. Thanks. Iris, Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40 "If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming train." Robert Lowell (1917-1977) |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| > << Isn't this the date palm calling the ginkgo dioecious? >> Iris Cohen <[Only registered users see links. ]> schreef + + + Up to a point. It seems to me that dioicy is pretty decent, perhaps even a little puritanical? Wouldn't a better line be "Isn't this the Amorphophallus titanum calling the Aristolochia grandiflora malodorous?" PvR |
|
#30
| |||
| |||
| << "Isn't this the Amorphophallus titanum calling the Aristolochia grandiflora malodorous?" >> Keep it simple: Taraxicum officinale calls Oxalis a weed. Iris, Central NY, Zone 5a, Sunset Zone 40 "If we see light at the end of the tunnel, It's the light of the oncoming train." Robert Lowell (1917-1977) |
| Tags |
| grafted , rootstock |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| whether grafted RockElm or rootstock SiberianElm and what roles theyplay | Archimedes Plutonium | Botany Forum | 2 | 07-17-2009 08:27 PM |