Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Animal and Molecular Model Systems > Arabidopsis and Plant Biology
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Arabidopsis and Plant Biology Discuss Arabidopsis and Plant Biology Research.


who has conducted the clonetech supressive subtractive hybrid?

who has conducted the clonetech supressive subtractive hybrid? - Arabidopsis and Plant Biology

who has conducted the clonetech supressive subtractive hybrid? - Discuss Arabidopsis and Plant Biology Research.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2006, 09:56 AM
huxb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default who has conducted the clonetech supressive subtractive hybrid?



hi, I have a question to ask,
one friend of mine has conducted the clonetech supressive subtractive hybrid recently. and she did well all through the experiment, untill the last round of PCR, she gained no visible bands. But the PCR of the first round worked very well, a bright smeared area visible just as the protocol discribed. The second PCR is a nested one using 1st PCR as template. It should work based on logics, but she has tried several times and found no further improvement. Each step was set according to standard protocol. Can anyone give us suggestions? Thank you very much



Ph D. Xuebo Hu
Centre for molecular virology,
Institute of Microbiology,
Chinese Academy of Sciences




Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
clonetech , conducted , hybrid , subtractive , supressive


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.13964 seconds with 15 queries