Go Back   Science Forums Biology Forum Molecular Biology Forum Physics Chemistry Forum > Molecular Research Topics Forum > Protein Science > Antibody Forum
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Antibody Forum Antibody Forum. Ask and discuss antibody suppliers, antibody related techniques and protocols, and antibody production such as using phage display libraries.


Custom antibody does not work as expected

Custom antibody does not work as expected - Antibody Forum

Custom antibody does not work as expected - Antibody Forum. Ask and discuss antibody suppliers, antibody related techniques and protocols, and antibody production such as using phage display libraries.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2009, 10:53 PM
Pipette Filler
Points: 4, Level: 1 Points: 4, Level: 1 Points: 4, Level: 1
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Custom antibody does not work as expected



Hi All,
I am a new guy come working with antibody. Recently I've got a great trouble and hope you guys can help

Say I have a peptide LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK. Because of the hydrophilicity, the sequence DNEETFLK in the C terminus are used to prepare an antibody to capture the original peptide. We pay to a biotech company who is expert in this. The company use the DNEETFLK-KLH conjugate as immunogen, and DNEETFLKC (with an extra C in C termins) as the antigen when they screen the antibody from animal serum. For what I've know, the extra C is for conjugation with the solid substrate during immunoaffinity chromatography and shouldn't be an issue I am going to mention.

Okay so I have the antibody, antigen (DNEETFLKC) and the LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK peptide. I did a direct ELISA with DNEETFLKC. It works perfectly (at 2ng /well level) . I did a competitive with DNEETFLKC, it works too. Now I did a direct ELISA with LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK, no, I don't see any signal. I coated the plate with DNEETFLKC and use LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK as the competitor. The longer peptide (serial dilution from 3 ug to 1 ng /well) didn't bind to the antibody at all.

At first we though there should have some trace residues causing the trouble from the synthetic LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK (done by other company).
I've spiked the DNEETFLKC to the LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK and the competitive ELISA works. So this eliminated the residue factor.

Then I suspect it is related to the orientation of the antibody-antigen pair. The epitopic sequence here is in the C terminus but not N or in the middle of LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK . However, the antibody recognizes the DNEETFLK from the N terminus during the antibody production.

My question is: will this be the troubling causing factor? that I will need an antibody recognizing from C terminus of DNEETFLK if I need it to recognize LVRPEVDVMCTAFHDNEETFLK?


Thanks again for your patient to read the long post. I will send an enquiry to the antibody production company too but I also appreciate any comments from you guys!


Jake

Last edited by jakekei; 12-14-2009 at 11:08 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
antibody , custom , expected , work


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about work and friction Robert Physics Forum 2 01-04-2008 12:50 PM
Politics And Cannibalism? Introducing The Dourties, Chelsea, Bill, Hillary, Barrack Obama, George Bush, Jr., And All Of Capital Hill! jon_johnfrancisayres@yahoo.com Microbiology Forum 0 10-06-2007 05:59 AM
Flaws in Current Atomic Theory? cinquirer Physics Forum 42 11-25-2003 07:58 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005 - 2012 Molecular Station | All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.13872 seconds with 16 queries